When the charged balloon is brought near the wall, it repels some of the negatively charged electrons in that part of the wall. Therefore, that part of the wall is left repelled.
<u>Explanation</u>:
- Balloons don't stick to walls. However, if you rub the balloon on an appropriate piece of material such as clothing or a wall, electrons are pulled from the other material to the balloon.
- The balloon now as more electrons than normal and therefore has an overall negative charge. Two balloons like this will repel each other.
- The other material now has an overall positive charge. Because opposite charges attract, the balloon will now appear to stick to the other material. If you didn't rub the balloon first, it's charge would be neutral and it wouldn't stick to the wall.
Explanation:
According to the law of the conservation of mass, 'mass is conserved in a chemical reaction. The mass cannot be created nor be destroyed in a chemical process'.
This law holds true for the burning of wood also. Although the wood burns to produce ash which weighs less than wood but also, it produces some soot and other gases and the sum of the masses of all these is equal to the sum of the masses of wood and oxygen that reacted with it.
Answer:- 3.
and data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5071f/5071fd4978ff0a6d7dbda112859328ea0a94b828" alt="C_2H_6"
Explanations:- An empirical formula is the simplest whole number ratio of atoms of each element present in the molecule/compound.
For example, the molecular formula of benzene is
. The ratio of C to H in it is 6:6 that could be simplified to 1:1. So, an empirical formula of benzene is CH.
In the first pair, the ratio of C to H in first molecule is 2:4 that could be simplified to 1:2 and the empirical formula is
. In second molecule the ratio of C to H is 6:6 and it could be simplified to 1:1. and the empirical formula is CH. Empirical formulas are different for both the molecules of first pair and so it is not the right choice.
In second pair, C to H ratio in first molecule is 1:2, so the empirical formula is
. The C to H ratio for second molecule is 1:4, so the empirical formula is
. Here also, the empirical formulas are not same and hence it is also not the right choice.
In third pair, C to H ratio in first molecule is 1:3, so the empirical formula is
. In second molecule the C to H ratio is 2:6 and it is simplified to 1:3. So, the empirical formula for this one is also
. Hence. this is the correct choice.
In fourth pair, first molecule empirical formula is CH. Second molecule has 2:4 that is 1:2 mole ratio of C to H and so its empirical formula is
. As the empirical formulas are different, it is not the right choice.
So, the only and only correct pair is the third one. 3.
and data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5071f/5071fd4978ff0a6d7dbda112859328ea0a94b828" alt="C_2H_6"
Answer:
The first energy level is closest to the nucleus. The second energy level is a little farther away than the first. ... The electrons in the energy level farthest from the nucleus are called valence electrons. Atoms in the same column (group) in the periodic table have the same number of valence electrons.
Explanation:
Answer:
0.72 g of the lower oxide gave 0.8 g of higher oxide when oxidised. ... Thus, 90g of lower oxide contains as much metal as 100g of higher oxide, i.e., 80g (given). Hence, 80g of metal combines with 10g of oxygen in the lower oxide and 20g of oxygen in the higher oxide.