Ask question

Ask question

All categories

WINSTONCH [101]

3 years ago

12

FAST PLEASE Which best describes the numbers satisfying the inequality x less-than 7? all numbers greater than 7 all numbers les

s than 7 all numbers greater than and including 7 all numbers less than and including 7

2 answers:

Anon25 [30]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:all rational numbers less than 7

Step-by-step explanation:

fenix001 [56]3 years ago

3 0

All rational numbers less than 7

You might be interested in

I how to solve this problem

Mrac [35]

Look at the picture.<span>
</span>

5 0

3 years ago

If Yeison can read 5/8 of a manga in 2/3 of an hour, how many can he read in TWO hours ? (I’ll give brainlest or whatever it’s c

iVinArrow [24]

Answer:

1 and 7/8 in two hours

Step-by-step explanation:

4 0

3 years ago

Why is it important to be able to write a fraction in simplest form?

Alex

This is important because if you were to answer in complex fractions instead of its simplest form, you would have a tough time multiplying complex fractions together. You would get a HUGE denominator or numerator, which makes things difficult. It is important to write a fraction in its simplest form because of exactly that; making things simple. Would you rather multiply 64/132*64/132 or 1/2*1/2?

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

two bags contains 10 balls each. Every round you choose with equal probability one of the two bags and pick out a ball. After a

Stells [14]

Answer:

6.10%

Step-by-step explanation:

For every round since we are choosing with equal probability, then the probability of choosing from either of the bags is 1/2

Here, this scenario is only possible when a particular bag has been chosen 10 times and the other bag has been chosen 6 times ( meaning a particular bag has been emptied and for a particular bag to be emptied, all of its content would have been picked)

Now on the 17th trial, an empty bag is chosen

Therefore the required probability will be;

16C0 * (1/2)^10 * (1/2)^6 * 1/2 = 0.0610 = 6.1%

4 0

3 years ago

I geologist note is that the land alone at fault line moved 24.8 cm over the past 175 years on average how much did the land mor

zmey [24]

First, let's establish a ratio between these two values. We'll use that as a starting point. I personally find it easiest to work with ratios as fractions, so we'll set that up:

$\frac{24.8\ cm}{175\ years}$

To find the distance <em>per year</em>, we'll need to find the <em>unit rate</em> of this ratio in terms of years. The word <em>unit</em> refers to the number 1 (coming from the Latin root <em>uni-</em> ); a <em>unit rate</em> involves bringing the number we're interested in down to 1 while preserving the ratio. Since we're looking for the distance the fault line moves every one year, we'll have to bring that 175 down to one, which we can do by dividing it by 175. To preserve our ratio, we also have to divide the top by 175:

$\frac{24.8\ cm}{175\ years}\div \frac{175}{175} \approx 
\frac{0.14\ cm}{1\ year}$

We have our answer: approximately 0.14 cm or 1.4 mm per year

3 0

3 years ago