Radius = sqrt(18) = 3*sqrt(2)
diameter = 2(3sqrt(2)) = 6sqrt(2)
The answer is A
Have to add characters to get to 20
Answer: Choice B
There is not convincing evidence because the interval contains 0.
========================================================
Explanation:
The confidence interval is (-0.29, 0.09)
This is the same as writing -0.29 < p1-p1 < 0.09
The thing we're trying to estimate (p1-p2) is between -0.29 and 0.09
Because 0 is in this interval, it is possible that p1-p1 = 0 which leads to p1 = p2.
Therefore, it is possible that the population proportions are the same.
The question asks " is there convincing evidence of a difference in the true proportions", so the answer to this is "no, there isn't convincing evidence". We would need both endpoints of the confidence interval to either be positive together, or be negative together, for us to have convincing evidence that the population proportions are different.
Step-by-step explanation:
Take the number as x
12x-40=7x+25
collect like terms
12x-7x=25+40
5x=65(divide both sides by 5)
x=13
Therefore number is 13
See the picture attached to better understand the problem
we know that
a full circle is a 360 degrees
divided in 12 equals parts-------> 360/12-------> 30 degrees each part
<span>the smallest angle formed by the hands of a clock at 7 o'clock has 5 parts
so
5*30</span>°------> 150°
convert to radian
pi radians---------> 180°
x ---------------> 150°
x=150*pi/180--------> x=0.83*pi radians
the answer is0.83*pi radians or 2.62 radians