Answer
Yes
Explanation:
According to the Central Limit Theorem, the sample size, being n larger than 30, is representative of the Standford students´ use of the drug, in this case, being ecstasy. Another reason why the procedure works is the random sampling, where the assistants made sure that the only characteristic that mattered was being a student; gender, major being pursued, age, etc. were not of relevance.
Part of a group that does not like other countries
<span>The results may not generalize well. This is one of the goals of good scientific research: can the results be taken to fit more than just the sterile, controlled situations usually found in the research setting. Many times, it's been found, research tends to lack the ability to be placed in a more "natural" setting.</span>
They are considered Collectivistic.
A defendant employee is a person employed to perform a certain duty who possesses a particular set of talents.
A worker who has received a complaint is referred to as a defendant employee.
If the employee was simply acting as the defendant's agent and you claimed that what he was doing or what he saw made the employer or business liable to you, and what he was doing or what he saw was otherwise legal and took place while he was working (for example, if he was mopping the floor where you slipped and you claim he left it wet and didn't put a "wet floor" sign there).
In that case, the employer, not the employee, would be liable for any damages, therefore seems unlikely that the employee would decide to select his own legal counsel.
to learn more about the defendant's worker.
brainly.com/question/14820739\s
#SPJ4
