Answer:
2/8
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
She used inductive reasoning. (False)
She used the law of detachment. (True)
Her conclusion is valid. (True)
The statements can be represented as "if p, then q and if q, then r." (False)
Her conclusion is true. (True)
Step-by-step explanation:
p = Two lines are perpendicular
q = They intersect at Right angles.
Given: A and B are perpendicular
Conclusion: A and B intersect at right angle.
According to the law of detachment, There are two premises (statements that are accepted as true) and a conclusion. They must follow the pattern as shown below.
Statement 1: If p, then q.
Statement 2: p
Conclusion: q
In our case the pattern is followed. The truth of the premises logically guarantees the truth of the conclusion. So her conclusion is true and valid.
36 divided by 4 = 9
so then you take 3 times 9 which is 27 so the answer is
g=27
A) because it is 2/3 past 1
Answer:
The circle's centre is at the position (3, 5), and it has a radius of 2
Step-by-step explanation:
First let's put it in a useful format by completing the squares:
x² + y² - 6x - 10y + 30 = 0
x² - 6x + y² - 10y = -30
x² - 6x + 9 + y² - 10y + 25 = -30 + 9 + 25
(x - 3)² + (y - 5)² = 4
This tells us that the centre position is (3, 5) and the radius is √4, or 2