Based on the information given regarding the monopoly power, the remedy by the court will be<u> divesting itself of the control or ownership of</u><u> Child Shops</u>.
It should be noted that antitrust laws are put in place in order to protect consumers from business practices that are predatory and also ensure fair competition.
Since antitrust laws recommend the breaking of certain business conducts, there'll be the divesting of the company of the control or ownership of Child Shops.
Learn more about monopoly on:
brainly.com/question/13113415
Answer:
The answer is d: supported, suspended, and aerial lift trucks
Explanation:
An elevated temporary work platform is called a scaffold. Scaffolds can be divided into two categories:
Supported scaffolds are made up of one or more platforms that are held up by rigid parts like, for example, poles, frames and legs.
The scaffolds that hang from ropes or another pliable, above support, consisting of one or more platforms are suspended scaffolds
Aerial lifts, in particular, can be thought of as different kinds of supported scaffolds.
Answer:
option B
Explanation:
In other to know how return fluctuation can be predicted with for instance, x%, predictability, one has to look at the normal distribution curve of return (average returns) to standard deviation of those returns. (check the attached file for additional details).
Hence, to be 95% sure that investment losses are less than 8% one needs to look at 95% of all returns which infact Mean return plos or minus 20. If the lower bound of this interval is less than 8% then the investment needs to be selected
check attached file for additional details
Hey i did your assignment but it won’t let me send it all so do you have any social media platforms i can send it to?
Answer:
The question is actually missing (see attached image):
the answer is:
D. Less than that of its competitors.
Explanation:
Personally, I believe that GM is an extremely spoiled child that refuses to assume responsibility for its continuous and never ending mistakes. GM has either filed for bankruptcy or threatened to do so twice in the last 30 years or so, and every time the US government has to bail them out. But GM keeps doing things wrong.
It doesn't matter if you like their cars or not, GM is terribly managed. No other company in US history has received so much financial aid from the government and continued to lose money and work inefficiently. The problem is that whenever things go wrong, stockholders lose their money but the executives keep getting tens of millions of dollars. If a company is managed in such a disastrous way, their top management shouldn't get paid that much.
A car factory costs a lot of money, and not using it efficiently is outrageous considering GM's history. If they had never received a cent from the government, then its only their problem. But the government lost $11.2 billion on GM's last bailout. During the 1980s GM lobbied fro the government to impose import quotas on Japanese cars because they were better cars and GM couldn't compete against them. So whenever they do things wrong, big brother has to help them. During the last couple of years GM had to sell most of its foreign operations in order to get cash, and you generally do not make money by selling your assets.