Answer:
Hmmm, let's see... prejudice/bigotry and indoctrination.
Intolerance cannot be 'most closely' related to a singular factor (of those listed). It is generally either an acquired and artificial propensity or simply a detestable aspect of human nature. There is a tendency for many to fear or to disdain anything starkly dissimilar to their own way.
Even if this bullying does not issue from a profoundly ideological perspective, it is a form of intolerance. Unfortunately, certain individuals are inclined to prey on those they feel they can easily torment with impunity and with support from others. In this case, the unsavory behaviour is likely more to do with the individual administering the persecution than with the victim.
In short, I cannot respond (to my own satisfaction) with any given selection of the answers proposed, but the likely 'correct' answer is <em>gender stereotypes</em>, as the word 'stereotypes' implies a form of prejudice and is therefore closest to intolerance. What is more, society's conception of gender and its 'norms' is objectively related to society's treatment of the LGBTQ community, unlike the other answers proposed (areas of interest, types of clothing, communication styles), which are instead related to gender norms/stereotypes.
Explanation:
I must apologise for this rather profuse answer, which you can take to mean 'I am ultimately uncertain '. I confess that I take issue with the question without any context. Is it based on some passage, in which factors of bullying are discussed? Regardless, I hope this helps :D
Answer:
No allowance is given in requirement tables for stress, disease, parasites, temperature, feed additives, breed, genetic potential,
Explanation:
Answers:
1. Three problems associated with alcohol
a. High blood pressure
b. Liver and kidney disease or cancer
c. Heart diseases
2. “The direct answer to this question is that the government does not decide the legal status of drugs based on scientific assessment of potential for harm.
The ranking of drugs is a very interesting and controversial topic (subject to the apples and oranges problem), but it is simply not the basis by which governments make these decisions. The chart is worth analyzing, but it won't answer the question.
Practically speaking, making alcohol illegal is untenable. It was attempted in the United states in the 1920s, and I am not aware of any credible historians that consider prohibition to have been a success. Alcohol use has been present amongst humankind for millennia. It spans society, race, social class, etc. It does certainly present great potential for harm, individually through the detrimental health effects of abuse, and societally through the impact of impaired decision making, most notably drunk driving.
Despite that, alcohol also clearly provides some benefits that drive some people to use it. Others choose not to use it at all. Many use it without issue, and some develop problems. It is an effective social lubricant. In many cultures it is a common component of traditional celebrations, and in some cultures it is even a component of formal business interactions. It is one of the central rituals in the Catholic church.
Many of the problems associated with alcohol use can be reasonably mitigated without blanket prohibition, i.e. drunk driving and age restrictions. Many of the problems are also solved through basic social structures, in which friends and family address issues independently.
Given the above, the clear follow-on question is why these other, less harmful, drugs are illegal? If alcohol has demonstrated that it is actually more effective to manage these problems with regulation, how are other legalization decisions being made?
Those are much more complicated questions. The brief answers have to do with legacy (less history of widespread human use with other chemicals) and institutional racism.”
This is from the web so find details that will helped you and make sure to paraphrase!!
If helped mark me the brainiest!!
Sugars and starches belong to Carbohydrates
For this question it depends on each family and on the patient themselves. I suggest finding and talking to people with bipolar disorder and hear their experiences.
