Answer:
they are different because of the mode sign on the second 's',
which if you are wondering what it stands for,
it represents only the magnitude of the value needed, not its sign,
let the assumed value of s be -5,
for example iin the first case, s < 3
hence s = -5, and it is true for s < 3
OR
if we take the second case, lsl < 3
that would be s = 5 [ not -5], which would not be true for lsl < 3
i hope u understood it,
if any more questions...please ask :)
Yes it is correct, make sure to check your work carefully though, i’ve used that math program in the past and it can be confusing.
Answer:
Correlation requires both variables to be quantitative.
Step-by-step explanation:
The correlation coefficient measures the strength of relationship between two quantitative variables. In the given scenario correlation between sex of American workers and their income is computed and indicated that there is a high correlation between them. The sex of American worker is a categorical variable or a qualitative variable while income of American worker is a quantitative variable. The correlation between a quantitative variable and a qualitative variable can't be computed. So, the statement explains the blunder in the given scenario is "Correlation requires both variables to be quantitative".
Answer:
(4t − 3) (t − 6)
Step-by-step explanation:
Using AC method:
Given a quadratic ax² + bx + c, find factors of ac that add up to b. Divide those factors by a and reduce. The denominators become the coefficients and the numerators become the constants.
Here, a = 4, b = -27, and c = 18.
ac = 4 × 18 = 72
Factors of 72 that add up to -27: -3 and -24
Divide factors by a: -3/4 and -24/4
Reduce: -3/4 and -6/1
So the factored expression is:
(4t − 3) (t − 6)
Answer:
6.85 oz
Step-by-step explanation:
13.7 ÷ 2 = 6.85
