If I were Harrison in exactly the same situation, I would have chosen to save other people. Since Harrison has to be smarter than the rest of the people in the story because of the insane number of handicaps he wears, I think I would have spent time prior to escaping finding a way to free other people of their handicaps and overtaking the government, especially the Handicapper General, Diana Moon Glampers.
Instead of going on national television to find an empress, I would have escaped underground and found others to help me or I would have found a way to get the weapons/fighters/etceteras to help me actually overthrow the government. I would have tried to find ways to help people celebrate their unique talents while also finding a way to make sure that people aren't discriminated against so that society could be fair to all people and still rich with culture and art and things of beauty.
As the story is told, Harrison and the empress were killed by Glampers, and because of the handicaps, nobody even knows it happened, not even his parents...and it happens on live television! There is no way a revolution could be started if there aren't people to keep the fight going. It makes a lot more sense to overthrow the government first and then find someone to dance with.
For me personally, I would want to use my talents to help other people, and, since the story seems to want the reader to think about how important individuality is, I think I would want my story to be one that embraced my talents and strengths in a way that would really help other people.
The literary work in which Joseph Heller used his military experiences as a primary source is B. Catch-22.
<h3>What is Catch-22?</h3>
Catch-22 is a fiction that was written by Joseph Heller in 1953 and originally printed in 1961.
It was based on the story of Captain John Yossarian during the Second World War (WWII). Joseph Heller's unique experience as a bombardier during the war served as a primary basis when he was writing Catch-22.
Read more on primary sources here:
brainly.com/question/24511160
#SPJ1
Answer:
provide a summary of the story
Explanation:
<u>Answer:</u>
Lazarus, in her poem, ‘Heroes, an inspiring work’ emphasizes the fact that some people who accept their lives as it is should receive more appreciations. Whereas, Wilcox, in her poem, explains that there is no necessity to accept life as it is. She strongly believes that if someone commits an error, they must try to resolve it. She also explains that it is not a bad idea to rebuild a life again. The following lines illustrate her strong approach towards regret,
''If he will stand firm on the grave of his errors,
And instead of regretting, resolve, resolve.
"
