Answer:
The line observed on the map corresponds to the Andes, a very tall mountain range
a. m. rose (ed.) human behaviour and social processes (pp.128-147). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul is related with "The Meaning of Contemplation for Social Qualitative Research".
<h3>What was written in that book?</h3>
In this work, contemplative reflection in qualitative social research is described. It considers the ways in which the researcher's fundamental assumptions can be analyzed and bracketed in order to shed light on the process by which knowledge is produced, with an emphasis on the researcher's experiences, including sensory and emotional experiences, and the work of the mind in the investigative process. The author discusses the crucial role of subjectivity in qualitative research and offers inspiration for more attentive research through an examination of the techniques of meditation, auto-observation and self-reports, epoché, "contemplative memoing," and the contemplative diary. Thus, it will be interesting to sociology, anthropology, and geography academics who are interested in phenomenology, research techniques, and the function of the mind in the research process.
To know more about human behaviour and social processes visit: brainly.com/question/10264939
#SPJ4
The answer is option D "Republican Party." Because of the fight over slavery as a result of it was the <span>Republican Party. There are two parties that are in battle with each other the democrats and the republicans both have there separate views on the government and how to government should be.
Hope this helps!
</span>
Answer: 5 is rounding
6 is sort
7. Deposition
8. Energy
9. depositional
10. tall
They are 100% guaranteed right.
Explanation:
the internal validity is still manipulated by the researcher and the DV is measured.
The DV is a variable that is being measured/observed, whereas the IV is a variable that is altered to see how it impacts something else. The term "dependent" refers to the idea that the IV will have an impact on the DV.
<h3>What parallels exist between studies conducted in a lab and those conducted in the field?</h3>
Since experiments are the only way to reliably establish causality, laboratory and field experiments are comparable in that they are both helpful in determining cause and effect. Furthermore, because there is a high level of control over confounding variables, the two experiment designs have the potential to have high internal validity.
Learn more about internal validity:
brainly.com/question/15704269
#SPJ4
