Answer: Checks and balances
Explanation: Checks and balances is a principle accustomed to a constitutional government. In the United States where the branches of governmental power are The Executive, The Legislature and the Judiciary. Checks and balances allows a certain branch to deliberate on or review the action of another branch. This is particular essential in ensuring that a certain branch is not wielding too much power and also aims to prevent or avoid mistakes and ultimately check centralization of power in a particular branch.
Answer: Hand-withdrawal reflex involves only the spinal cord, so it takes time before the information about pain reaches the brain
Explanation:
When baby touches the pan with his index finger and take quite a bit time as the thermal receptor in the hand sense the stimuli and carries this information to the spinal cord which in turn send it to the brain. Finally brain sense it and passes the information to the hand to change its position by giving the pain signals.
Answer: Discovery of Gold at Sutter's Mill and Cheap Land Prices
Explanation: Hope this helps <3
Answer:A get-rich-quick scheme is a plan to obtain high rates of return for a small investment. The term "get rich quick" has been used to describe shady investments since at least the early 20th century.[1][2]
Explanation: Most schemes create an impression that participants can obtain this high rate of return with little risk, and with little skill, effort, or time. Get-rich-quick schemes often assert that wealth can be obtained by working at home. Legal and quasi-legal get-rich-quick schemes are frequently advertised on infomercials and in magazines and newspapers. Illegal schemes or scams are often advertised through spam or cold calling. Some forms of advertising for these schemes market books or compact discs about getting rich quick rather than asking participants to invest directly in a concrete scheme.
Many people talk about academic excellence — but who or what really defines this elusive quality?
Michèle Lamont, Robert I. Goldman Professor of European Studies and professor of sociology and of African and African American studies, analyzes the system of peer review in her new book “How Professors Think: Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment” (Harvard University Press, 2009). By examining the process of scholarly evaluation, she also addresses larger questions about academia.
“In some ways studying peer evaluation and review is a point of entry into a much broader issue, which is the issue of meritocracy in American higher education,” says Lamont.
To research the book, Lamont interviewed panelists from research councils and societies of fellows who were evaluating proposals for research funding in the social sciences and the humanities.
Lamont explains that academics must constantly make evaluations, whether of scientific findings or of graduate students. Expertise, personal taste, and the perspective of the evaluator play into the decision-making process, she writes.
“A lot of what the book does is to look at what criteria people use to judge and what meaning they give to these criteria,” says Lamont. “So for instance, what do they mean by ‘significance’ and what do they mean by ‘originality’? How does the definition of ‘originality’ and ‘significance’ vary between philosophy and economics? How strong is the consensus between fields?
