Answer:
Medical education is nowadays justifiably considered to be the most challenging field of scientific research. New innovative teaching techniques and instructional methods are being gradually implemented in several University Medical Schools all over the world. It is believed that a doctor’s capability of successfully coping with urgent medical conditions and effectively carrying out practical medical procedures depends to a great extent on the presence or absence of practical orientation during his basic medical training. Thus, health professionals and specialists of the educational process are presently familiarizing with new teaching protocols that oppose to what has been established so far, deviate from conventional methodologies such as plain theoretical lectures with no practical component and are related to digital forms of educational technology that are mainly computer-assisted. The extent to which the implementation of these tools in the Hellenic Medical Education system has provided improved outcomes in terms of students’ clinical skill attainment remains, however, unclear.
According to the regional compulsory medical education curriculum, undergraduate cardiology training is limited to a one-month period, which takes place during the fifth year of medical studies (the total duration of medical studies is 6 years). The schedule includes a combination of tutorials-case discussion and clinical practice from 8:00 am to 13:30 pm three times a week. During this period, students visit in rotation several sub-departments of the clinic, such as the echocardiography department, the outpatient clinics, the catheterization laboratory and the coronary intensive care unit.
The objective of this study is to estimate whether attending a practical cardiology course of one-month duration can actually improve undergraduate fifth year medical students’ self-reported performance efficiency in terms of five basic cardiological clinical skills.
Explanation:
Answer:
They are both reflecting the inner thoughts of the object -- Donny.
There is a whole series of events where the original rules were altered. Originally the pigs lived under a constitution of 8 commandments. One of them was about alcohol which was forbidden. In this scene it was altered to be allowed in moderation.
Sleeping in beds was also forbidden. That was altered to sleeping in beds with sheets. So you have to choose between B C or D which all have truth in them. The other animals all know that there is something wrong, but they cannot use the law to right things. The pigs have foreseen that they might resort to this and have changed the law so it now allows them to do what they are doing. Nobody has a copy of the original constitution.
So what do we pick? Barley does not have to be used for beer. Some of the animals (like the horses) are vegetarians and barley would be a treat. It is true that the pigs had the barley planted, but never for the benefit of others. B is true, but it is not ironic.
They prohibited alcohol when they took over the farm. That is a fact.
What is ironic is that they discovered that alcohol in limited amounts was enjoyable and so they modified the constitution to suit the fact.
That makes C the answer, which I like as an answer. It is not only ironic, it shows the hypocrisy of the pigs. They didn't legalize drinking entirely, just the right to have a little bit. Who defines that? They do.
Apparently the answer from outside sources is D. So that's what you should go with.
Answer:
Moishe The Beadle was a foriegn Jew. He was a mentor to Elie Wiesel.
Explanation:
Answer: It depends.
Explanation: Yes - If the narrator uses pronouns like "I" "We" "My" "Me" it means that narrator is part of the story.
No - if the narrator only uses names or he/she/they without ever mentioning being with the story characters.
