The answer would be x ≠ 0
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
First start with the left side, doing distributive property
So... -2(x) = -2x and -2(5) = -10 Therefore on the left side you now have -2x -10
Next do the same on the right side
-2(x) = - 2x and -2(-2) = 4 so you have -2x + 4 + 5 and you add 4 and 5, leaving you with -2x + 9
Now that you have simplified both sides the problem now looks like this:
-2x - 10 = -2x + 9
Because you have equal terms on both sides (-2) those cancel out so you have -10 = 9
Just from looking at this we know that the statement is false because -1o does not equal 9
*The symbol, "≠" means not equal to"
Answer:
4 7/8 or 4.875
Step-by-step explanation:
1 1/4 + 3 5/8 = 4 7/8 or 4.875
PLEASE MARK ME AS BRAINLIEST UWU
To evaluate when plugging in numerical values for variables, simply put the numerical values in the place of the corresponding variables:
There's not much math work here, they just want you to eyeball the graph and give the closest grid point to where the two lines meet.
Let's translate the question.
Solution to the system
That's the x and y values where the two lines cross. That's because the meeting point is the value of x and y that satisfies both equations.
Approximation ... to the nearest integer values
Where two integer grid lines cross is called a lattice point. It's a point with integer coordinates. Our solution, the meet of these two lines, doesn't fall exactly on a lattice point. The nearest integer values means the closest lattice point to our intersection of lines.
Eyeballing the graph, I'd say (x,y)=(2,3) is the closest point.
Answer: (2,3) second choice
Answer: 
Step-by-step explanation:
There is a double root at x=5 and a single root at x=-2, so we know f(x) is of the form 
for some constant a.
To find a, we can substitute the coordinates of the y-intercept, (0, -50).
So,
