Answer:
First year depreciation expense is $2,250
Explanation:
Total depreciation expense is given by:
Price - Salvage Value = 40,000 - 4,000 = 36,000
That $36,000 depreciation expense would be spread out for 200,000 miles.
So for the first year in which the truck is used 12,500 miles, the depreciation expense will be
Question answered.
Note:
The instrument that Shawn must use is “payable to the order of” before the name of the payee.
<h3>Requirements of Negotiability </h3>
- The first of the four major considerations is whether or not a paper is negotiable, and it is one that nonlawyers must address.
- Auditors, retailers, and financial institutions frequently handle notes and checks and must make quick decisions about negotiability.
- In a negotiable instrument, the only permissible promise or direction is to pay a particular sum of money. Any other promise or command renders negotiability null and void
- This restriction exists to prohibit an instrument from having an uncertain value.
- If the bearer of a negotiable instrument had to examine whether a provision or condition had been met before the thing had any value, the utility of the object as a substitute for money would be severely diminished.
Hence, the instrument that Shawn must use is “payable to the order of” before the name of the payee.
To learn more about the Negotiation instrument refer to:
brainly.com/question/9312091
#SPJ4
Answer:
The correct answer is overextension.
Explanation:
In the context of language acquisition, it refers to the erroneous over-generalization in the use of a word; that is, to the error that consists in extending the application of words to entities or objects not included in the concept or category of reference, even if they share certain characteristics. For example, the word "dog" is used to correctly designate dogs; but it is also used in reference to any other animal with "four legs."
Answer:
Present value = $21,804 (approx)
Explanation:
Given:
Periodic payment = $3,200
Number of period = 12
Interest rate = 10% = 10/100 = 0.1
Present value = ?
Computation of Present value:
![Present\ value = PMT[\frac{1-(1+r)^{-n}}{r} ]\\\\Present\ value = 3,200[\frac{1-(1+0.1)^{-12}}{0.1} ]\\\\Present\ value = 3,200[\frac{1-(1.1)^{-12}}{0.1} ]\\\\Present\ value = 3,200[\frac{1-0.318630818}{0.1} ]\\\\Present\ value = 3,200[\frac{0.681369182}{0.1} ]\\\\Present\ value = 21,803.6188](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=Present%5C%20value%20%3D%20PMT%5B%5Cfrac%7B1-%281%2Br%29%5E%7B-n%7D%7D%7Br%7D%20%5D%5C%5C%5C%5CPresent%5C%20value%20%3D%203%2C200%5B%5Cfrac%7B1-%281%2B0.1%29%5E%7B-12%7D%7D%7B0.1%7D%20%5D%5C%5C%5C%5CPresent%5C%20value%20%3D%203%2C200%5B%5Cfrac%7B1-%281.1%29%5E%7B-12%7D%7D%7B0.1%7D%20%5D%5C%5C%5C%5CPresent%5C%20value%20%3D%203%2C200%5B%5Cfrac%7B1-0.318630818%7D%7B0.1%7D%20%5D%5C%5C%5C%5CPresent%5C%20value%20%3D%203%2C200%5B%5Cfrac%7B0.681369182%7D%7B0.1%7D%20%5D%5C%5C%5C%5CPresent%5C%20value%20%3D%2021%2C803.6188)
Present value = $21,804 (approx)
If the new hires had not been adequately trained to make use of the system. This is an example of fundamental attribution bias.
<h3>What is fundamental attribution bias?</h3>
Fundamental attribution bias can be defined as the way in which a person judge another person without considering the situation factors.
Based on the giveing scenario Paulina is using fundamental attribution bias on the new employ by ignoring the reason why the new hire did not use the company's expert software system.
Therefore this is an example of fundamental attribution bias.
Learn more about fundamental attribution bias here:brainly.com/question/17109470
