Answer:
A. Contingency planning
Explanation:
Contingency planning refers to the an approach in forecasting unexpected events by developing an action plan to appropriately respond to such threats. In this scenario, despite that the company expects favourable sales in the future, it is planning to face an unexpected drop in sales.
That means that she is going to have to work harder to be the best lawyer in the area, or move to an area with fewer lawyers
Answer:
Net present value at 8%=($42510)
Explanation:
Explanation- Net present value = Present value of cash inflows – Total outflows
={(19000*6.7100) - $170000}
=$127490- $170000
= ($42510)
Annual net cash inflows = Net income+ Depreciation
= $4000+$15000
= $19000
Straight line Method:-
= Cost of asset- Salvage value of asset/No. of useful life (years)
=($170000-$20000)/10 years
=$150000/10 years = $15000
Net present value at 3%=($7926)
Explanation- Net present value = Present value of cash inflows – Total outflows
={(19000*8.5302) - $170000}
=$162074- $170000
= ($7926)
Annual net cash inflows = Net income+ Depreciation
= $4000+$15000
= $19000
Straight line Method:-
= Cost of asset- Salvage value of asset/No. of useful life (years)
=($170000-$20000)/10 years
=$150000/10 years = $15000
Answer:
Answer is option a, i.e. trade-offs and connections may differ in short run and the long run.
Explanation:
Keynes' law in economics and Say's law in economics are contradictory in their perspective. Where Keynes' law says that it is the demand that creates the supply, on the other hand, Say's law states that its the supply that tends to create the demand. But, we cannot neglect any of the above facts as demand and supply cant operate independently. So, on combining the two laws, we happen to take both the given laws into account. Also, it is found that Keynes' law is more appropriate and accurate for the short-run whereas, Say's law is for the long run. This thus creates trade-offs and connections that differ in the short-run and long-run by affecting the three important goals of macroeconomics, i.e. higher standard of living, low inflation, and low unemployment.
