No, human-inaccessible decisions doesn't help data science contribute to the interplay of human and artificial intelligence because data science does not contribute to the interaction between human and artificial intelligence in a way that renders judgments inaccessible to humans.
<h3>
What is the difference between human and artificial intelligence?</h3>
Whether it is human or artificial, intelligence is crucial. Human intelligence is a quality that aids people in learning, comprehending, and coming up with innovative solutions to problems, as opposed to artificial intelligence, which imitates people based on the knowledge it is given.
<h3>
Can humans have artificial intelligence?</h3>
In order for the area to advance, engineers are needed to design and test AI systems. Humans and AI cannot be swapped since neither can exist without the other. Many developers believe that in the future, robots may be able to reason for themselves.
Learn more about human and artificial intelligence: brainly.com/question/23791705
#SPJ4
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Video evidence is considered to be the best among all evidence. The video provides an exact representation of any crime scene. sometimes Video helps to recognize the suspect very clearly that is why it is advisable to install CCTV cameras outside the premises.
Video evidence provides every minute details of the crime that can be beneficial in resolving the case like the timing of crime, the number of people involved, etc.
I have to post an answer to see the comments.
Answer:
It would be necessary to focus on the objective information, and also to separate the influence of the present cultural environment from the past events.
Explanation:
In the study of past events, it would be necessary to take into account the idea of being objective towards the information about historical events. Since, it is known that the perception of the present surrounding environment and the social interaction lived by the researcher, could affect the study of past events,. It would be important to draw a line in order to separate the information corresponding to each epoch of time without modifying history by the influence of the present.
Answer:
Manolo: Hello ... Irene, isn't it?
Irene: Yes. I'm Irene, okay?
MAnolo: Alright. I'm Manolo.
Irene: I hope I wasn't late.
Manolo: What time is it?
Irene: 2 pm.
Manolo: You arrived just in time.
Irene: What course do you take?
Manolo: I study history and philosophy and you?
Irene: English literature.
Manolo: Can we start the research?
Irene: Yes, we can. I believe that we can find suitable books in the third hall. Should we go?
Manolo: Sure.
Explanation:
The dialogue was made with basic questions between two people who were meeting and needed to do academic work together. As they were in a library, I believe that the execution of some academic research between the two is the most appropriate subject to establish this dialogue.
