Answer: y > x, y > 2
The horizontal line goes through 2 on the y axis. This boundary line is represented by the equation y = 2, since every point on this line has a y coord of 2. The shading above it means that the inequality is y > 2. Every point in the shaded region of y > 2 has a y coord that is larger than 2.
The other inequality is y > x because we shade above the dashed boundary line y = x, which is that slanted dashed line.
Combining the two regions of y > 2 and y > x leads to what is shown.
It is most likely the mean. Because the mean is the center of the data
Answer:
There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim μ > 54.4.
Step-by-step explanation:
1) Previous concepts
A hypothesis is defined as "a speculation or theory based on insufficient evidence that lends itself to further testing and experimentation. With further testing, a hypothesis can usually be proven true or false".
The null hypothesis is defined as "a hypothesis that says there is no statistical significance between the two variables in the hypothesis. It is the hypothesis that the researcher is trying to disprove".
The alternative hypothesis is "just the inverse, or opposite, of the null hypothesis. It is the hypothesis that researcher is trying to prove".
2) Solution to the problem
On this case we want to test is
and the system of hypothesi on this case are:
Null Hypothesis: ![\mu \leq 54.4](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cmu%20%5Cleq%2054.4)
Alternative hypothesis:![\mu >54.4](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cmu%20%3E54.4)
On this case is our decision is FAILS to reject the null hypothesis then we can conclude that we don't have enough evidence to support the claim at the significance level provided. So the correct conclusion would be:
There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim μ > 54.4.
Answer:
784
Step-by-step explanation:
you take the 49 and times is by 16
there are 4 sides