Answer:
traditional goal setting
Explanation:
This is traditional goal setting because the goals flow from the top down. Each organisational area then incorporates them from the top down.
Answer:
Quantitative judgments are mainly based on statistical analysis of acquired data, whereas subjective judgments are dependent on a variety of algorithms such as data kind and quality, influencing variables, hazard identification, and etc.
Consider qualitative aspects that may affect your decision to buy items from a third-party vendor. The supplier's dependability, the quality of its administration, and the grade of its commodities are instances of such criteria.
To solve this problem, we use the formula:
F = A [(1 + i)^n – 1] / i
where,
F is the future value or the amount he will have
A is the amount he invest each year = 1200
n is number of years = 70 – 21= 49
i is the interest or return rate = 7% = 0.07
Hence the value of F is:
F = 1200 * [1.07^49 – 1] / 0.07
<span>F = $454,798.80 </span>
Current market conditions
Answer:
=> fraction of the portfolio that should be allocated to T-bills = 0.4482 = 44.82%.
=> fraction to equity = 0.5518 = 55.18%.
Explanation:
So, in this question or problem we are given the following parameters or data or information which are; that the utility function is U = E(r) – 0.5 × Aσ2 and the risk-aversion coefficient is A = 4.4.
The fraction of the portfolio that should be allocated to T-bills and its equivalent fraction to equity can be calculated by using the formula below;
The first step is to determine or Calculate the value of fraction to equity.
Hence, the fraction to equity = risk premium/(market standard deviation)^2 - risk aversion.
= 8.10% ÷ [(20.48%)^2 × 3.5 = 0.5518.
Therefore, the value for fraction of the portfolio that should be allocated to T-bills = 1 - fraction to equity = 1 - 0.5518 =0.4482 .
