Answer:
a. 0.60.
Explanation:
Marginal Propensity to Consume is a metric which enables to measure the increase in consumer spending when there is increase in consumer disposable income. The proportion of disposable income with increase in spending is known as marginal propensity to consume.
The correct answer is 0.60. This is calculated by dividing consumption by the spending.
Marginal propensity to consume = $900 / $1,500
Marginal propensity to consume = 0.60.
Answer: the correct answer is e. Participation
Explanation:
Participation in business appeals to the idea that all individuals in an organization have to get involved since all the personnel in the company are in the same boat and share the same objectives or goals which is to thrive in a competitive business world.
The best explanation for the rise in economist salaries and the fall in accounting salaries would be (B) The supply of economists must have decreased, and the supply of accountants must have increased.
<h3>Why is this the best explanation?</h3>
When there is a decrease in the supply of a commodity, its prices will go up. The salaries of economists went up because the number of economists available, decreased.
When there is an increase in the supply of something, the price will decrease. This is why the accountants saw their salaries decrease - the number of accountants available increased.
In conclusion, option B is correct.
Find out more on demand and supply at brainly.com/question/4804206.
Answer:$600
Explanation:
The full amount of$600 will be credited to Perle as his service income on completion of the dental services and debited to wood account as a debtor.
The $200 will reduce the debt to $400 , the $400 which will be recorded through a journal by debiting bookcase and crediting Wood.
Narration. Recognition of bookcase built as debt payment.
Answer:
Option 4 is definitely correct: Whether real GDP increased cannot be determined with the information given.
Explanation:
The information that is given only states that there has been an increase in the market value of final goods and services in two years. So, we cannot conclude that production increased in Rushya or average price levels increased there as per Option A and C respectively, because market value can be increased by both increase in production or price levels. Even Option B cannot be concluded as the real GDP is dependent on other variables as compared to the total market value.
Thus, only appropriate statement is option D: we cannot determine increase in real GDP with the given information.
