This is what they call <span>condition precedent. The party's task to </span><span>perform arise after a specific event happens. However, when the event never happens, </span><span>the duty of the party to </span>perform will<span> never arise. The parties are discharged from the contract.</span><span> </span>
Answer:
A MS Excel file is attached for the Journal general , please find it.
Explanation:
Entries to be Journalized
Date Account DR. Cr.
March 24 Cash $26,000
Owner's Capital $26,000
September 8 Cash $6,500
Account receivable $6,500
Answer:
$8.93
Explanation:
The payment made to the stockholders is known as dividend.
Price of the stock can be determined by calculating the present value of all future expected dividends using cost of capital.
In this question $1.25 per share dividend is paid and rate of return / cost of capital is 14%, so price of stock will be calculated as follow.
Price of the share = Dividend / Cost of Capital = $8.93
Price of the share = $1.25 / 14% = $8.93
<u>Answer:</u>
<em>Filmmakers want movie titles that are short, memorable, appealing to consumers, and without legal restriction to </em><u><em>appeal to multiple cultures
</em></u>
<em></em>
<u>Explanation:</u>
Many independent filmmakers are amazed at the measure of exertion and ability required to verify a fair conveyance understanding. With the emotional increment in an autonomous generation, it is evident that numerous movie producers have aced the skills expected to confirm the cash and hardware and deliver the film.
Subsequently, if the Filmmaker has skillfully made content into an engaging film, the movie producer might have the option to get a superior arrangement.
Answer:
A. The seller would be primarily liable.
Explanation:
Subject to basis is a form of home buying options in real estate. It is a situation where the buyer takes over existing loan of a seller and make commitment to seller to continue repaying the loan to the lender.
Though the buyer will taken over the loan from the seller and make repayment to the lender, there is no legal obligation on buyer`s part that makes him/her liable to the lender. The seller still remain liable despite the the taking over. So option A is right while B to D is wrong because it`s only the seller that is primarily liable to the lender.