Answer:
if foreign investment fell by 100% it would be totally eliminated, so it not possible for it to fall by more than 100%
Explanation:
Since in the question it is given that reduction of the western investment for the third world countries consist that foreign investment falls by 350% for the year 1990s
So if we go through the options, the wrong statement is the last one as it shows that the foreign investment fall by 100% i.e to be fully eliminated
Hence the other options are wrong
A free trade agreement or treaty is a multinational agreement according to international law to form a free-trade area between the cooperating states
The sooner you need the money, the less risk you will be willing to take on.
If you have until you retire, you may be more willing to gamble on riskier investments for the potential of bigger returns because if it doesn't work out you will still have plenty of time to make up the loss. However, if you need the money sooner for a car you should only take on a minimal amount of risk.
Feedback with the intention to help by listing reasonable arguements
Answer:
so correct option is b. -27%
Explanation:
given data
job manufacturing industry = 63.1 thousand
annual rate = 1.7 thousand
time period = 10 year
solution
the total loss of jobs over the 10 years will be:
total loss = 1.7 × 10
total loss = 17 thousand jobs
so that the percent change will be
percent change = 
percent change = -27 %
so correct option is b. -27%
