By virtue of their familiarity in a foreign country or region, IGOs and NGOs are a valuable source of information for a Joint Task Force commander who may have neither access to nor current information about the affected country or region.
Answer: Option B
<u>Explanation:
</u>
NGOs and IGOs are sources of information when certain forces do not tend to have the same. NGOs and IGOs are known for collecting information about the affected country or region. They consist of specialized people who have a better understanding or idea of what kind of data they are going to collect.
Although they tend to collect such data, they hardly disclose the same as it is for their purpose. Moreover, it is difficult to rely on data published by the government due to a lack of accuracy.
It really depends on how you look at after the fight with Germany ended we were still fighting Japan but the U.S dropped 2 atomic bombs killing over 360,000 people they did it without telling the allies because they wanted to send a message to Russia basically saying that we have these types of weapons don’t mess with us basically a flex. After the bombs were dropped the war ended but I don’t believe justice was served because the U.S committed a war crime by dropping those bombs and they did it for research purposes because as soon as the war ended they sent over researchers to go collect data on what happened and how it effected the people. There is a lot more in depth stuff that will make my argument more strong but if I type all that out I will be here all day. Over all I don’t believe justice was served but that’s everyone’s own opinion.
The correct answer is C. The hypothesis of the study.
Explanation:
In research, informed consent implies the researcher needs to inform potential participants about different aspects of the research and their participation, in this way they can decide whether or not to participate. This includes explaining potential participants about possible harms or benefits, procedures they will be involved in, among others. However, the researcher is not forced to inform them about the hypothesis of the study as this might influence participants' answers or performance and thus make the research invalid.
That's a ration like 4 out of 1 or 1 out of 4
Answer:
On May 17, 1954, Chief Justice Earl Warren issued the Supreme Court's unanimous decision in Brown v. Board of Education, ruling that racial segregation in public schools violated the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment. ... Brown was initially met with inertia and, in most southern states, active resistance.
Explanation:
