The answer is D. Partnerships are liable to boundless obligation, which implies that each of the partners shares the risk and budgetary dangers of the business. Which can be off-putting for a few people. This can be countered by the arrangement of a restricted obligation organization, which profits by the upsides of constrained risk allowed to restricted organizations, while as yet exploiting the adaptability of the association show.
Hi there
The answer is a
See the attachment for more details
Answer:
PV= $35,217,78
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Future value= $2,500,000
Number of periods= 63 years
Interest rate= 7% compounded annually
<u>To calculate the value of the prize today, we need to use the following formula:</u>
PV= FV/(1+i)^n
PV= 2,500,000 / (1.07^63)
PV= $35,217,78
Answer: A.There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean price of a single-family home has increased from its level two years ago of $299,500
Explanation:
From the question, we are informed that according to the Federal Housing Finance Board, the mean price of a single-family home two years ago was $299,500 and that a real estate broker believes that due to recent credit crunch, the mean price has increased since then and the result is that the null hypothesis is not rejected.
The conclusion based on the results of the test is that since the null hypothesis has been rejected, it simply means that there are sufficient evidence that there has been an increase in the mean price since two years ago.
Therefore, option A is the correct answer.
Answer:
high savings rate
Explanation:
High savings rate is not a goal of federal economic policy. The goal of federal economic policy is to achieve full employment, economic growth and stable prices.
However 'high savings rate' is achieved when interest rates are increased in order to fight inflation and achieve 'stable prices' because people keep their money in the banks to take advantage of the benefit of earning interest BUT this is not always the case because 'higher interest rates' works against full employment by making it too costly for firms to borrow for investments which will definitely create jobs.
