Answer: decrease ; less saving
Explanation:As people attempt to save more, the result is both a decline in output and unchanged saving. Although people want to save more at a given level of income, their income decreases by an amount such that their saving is unchanged. As people save more at their initial level of income, they decrease their consumption. But this decreased consumption decreases demand, which decreases production. A change in autonomous spending has a different effect on output than the actual change in autonomous spending.
Answer:
3. net income is understated by $175
Explanation:
There were two transactions omitted. The first transaction is unearned rent revenue of which $450 was earned. This earned rent revenue increases income by $450. While the second transaction was accrued interest payable of which $275 is owed. This interest payable increases liabilities by $275.
Therefore, from the above, income or revenue is understated by $450, while expenses is understated by $275.
Therefore, net income is understated by income less expenses, thus 450 - 275 = $175. This also implies that liabilities are overstated by $175.
Answer:
0.09 or 9%
Explanation:
This question has some irregularities. The correct question should be :
Elinore is asked to invest $4,900 in a friend's business with the promise that the friend will repay $5,390 in one year's time. Elinore finds her best alternative to this investment, with similar risk, is one that will pay her $ 5,341 in one year's time. U.S. securities of similar term offer a rate of return of 7%. What is the opportunity cost of capital in this case?
Solution
Given from the question
Investment (I) = $4,900
Return on investment (ROI) in one year = $5,341
Rate or opportunity cost of capital r is given by
ROI = I × (1 + r)
input the given data
$5,341 = $4,900 (1 + r)
$5,341 = $4,900 + $4,900r
$5,341 - $4,900 = $4,900r
r = ($5,341 - $4,900) / $4,900
r = 0.09
Or 9% in percentage
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Outside directors are members of the board of directors that are not employees of the corporation. While an inside director is a member of the board that is also employed by the corporation, e.g. CEO.
Corporations are separate entities form their stockholders, that is why limited liability applies to them. The board of directors doesn't have to include stockholders or employees, they usually do, but it is not required by law. Outside directors should very experienced and capable individuals that possess certain expertise that can help the corporation. Also, the board should control and supervise upper management, but if only inside directors were admitted into it, then who would control them?
