<span>Uprisings such as Shays' Rebellion highlighted the weakness of the "Articles of Confederation," since it became clear that the Articles did not give the central (federal) government enough power. </span>
It was the first multicultural empire in history. It was also the first very large empire. Because of this the Empire had to develop ways of running effectively. Roads were built over great distances. Standardize currency. Localized governing systems (i.e. satrapies). It was also the first time Asian powers attempted to invade Europe.
Answer:
D. A citizen of another country who is visiting the United States on vacation
Explanation: they are obviously a citizen of another country and not Americans. They are just on a visit not permanently staying. you still consider all the other as citizens.
A- There is a law in United State that said a child born on United States land atomically is American Citizen
B- That person who was born on American soil and now overseas can choose whether or not to change his/her citizenship or to keep it.
C- That person is an American and something else. He is both. That doesnt make him non American. Just mean he is both.
Yes, search what he said.. should heelp
Globalization must be expected to influence the distribution of income as well as its level. So far as the distribution of income between countries is concerned, standard theory would lead one to expect that all countries will benefit. Economists have long preached that trade is mutually beneficial, and most of us believe that the experience of widespread growth alongside rapidly growing trade in the postwar period serves to substantiate that. Similarly most FDI goes where a multinational has intellectual capital that can contribute something to the local economy, and is therefore likely to be mutually beneficial to investor and recipient. And a flow of capital that finances a real investment is again likely to benefit both parties, since the yield on the investment is expected to be higher than the rate of interest the borrower has to pay, while that rate of interest is also likely to be higher than the lender could expect at home since otherwise there would have been no incentive to send it abroad. Loose talk about free trade making the rich countries richer and poor countries poorer finds no support in economic analysis.