1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nat2105 [25]
3 years ago
13

What is the differences in a knights training to a samurais training?

History
1 answer:
kirza4 [7]3 years ago
4 0
Knights vs samurai Here are the differences between knights and samurai similarities -They both had swords -Both had a code of chivalry -Fought with honor of their country -Both wore armour -They both rode horses in battle - differences -The swords were different. eg. Katana -Knights had metal armour covering every inch of their body -Samurai carried two swords, a katana and a shorter blade(used for seppuku) -Samurai commited seppuku if their daimyo died or if they lost a battle. They did this to die in honor -Samurai wore more leather than steel -Weapons were different -Samurai looked more scary -Samurais had muskets. This wasn't untill the late medieval times. -Different religions. ie. Zen Buddhism for Japan and Christian/Catholic for Europe
You might be interested in
Uprisings such as Shays' Rebellion highlighted the weakness of the?
Brut [27]
<span>Uprisings such as Shays' Rebellion highlighted the weakness of the "Articles of Confederation," since it became clear that the Articles did not give the central (federal) government enough power. </span>
8 0
3 years ago
Why was the Persian Empire important in history? Why was the Persian Empire important in history?
Murrr4er [49]
It was the first multicultural empire in history. It was also the first very large empire. Because of this the Empire had to develop ways of running effectively. Roads were built over great distances. Standardize currency. Localized governing systems (i.e. satrapies). It was also the first time Asian powers attempted to invade Europe.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following people would be considered a non-citizen in the United States?
lubasha [3.4K]

Answer:

D.  A citizen of another country who is visiting the United States on vacation

Explanation: they are obviously a citizen of another country and not Americans. They are just on a visit not permanently staying. you still consider all the other as citizens.

A- There is a law in United State that said a child born on United States land atomically is American Citizen

B- That person who was born on American soil and now overseas can choose whether or not to change his/her citizenship or to keep it.

C- That person is an American and something else. He is both. That doesnt make him non American. Just mean he is both.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What are the keypoints in Obama's farewell speech<br><br><br>please ansa ASAP<br>thanks
Karo-lina-s [1.5K]
Yes, search what he said.. should heelp
3 0
3 years ago
What are consequences of globalization?
Oksi-84 [34.3K]

Globalization must be expected to influence the distribution of income as well as its level. So far as the distribution of income between countries is concerned, standard theory would lead one to expect that all countries will benefit. Economists have long preached that trade is mutually beneficial, and most of us believe that the experience of widespread growth alongside rapidly growing trade in the postwar period serves to substantiate that. Similarly most FDI goes where a multinational has intellectual capital that can contribute something to the local economy, and is therefore likely to be mutually beneficial to investor and recipient. And a flow of capital that finances a real investment is again likely to benefit both parties, since the yield on the investment is expected to be higher than the rate of interest the borrower has to pay, while that rate of interest is also likely to be higher than the lender could expect at home since otherwise there would have been no incentive to send it abroad. Loose talk about free trade making the rich countries richer and poor countries poorer finds no support in economic analysis.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Explain the origins and purpose of the Declaration of Independence
    9·2 answers
  • What improvements in health care were the Young Lords responsible for?
    13·1 answer
  • What important decisions had to be made concerning the fate of the seceded states and the rights of those freed from slavery?
    10·2 answers
  • What comes to mind when you hear the term “the Renaissance”
    13·2 answers
  • What would be some advantages that unitary and confederate governments have over a federalist governments
    12·1 answer
  • What did the woman of America fight for the most
    12·1 answer
  • What was the effect of the invention of the cotton gin on the United States in the first half of the nineteenth century?
    15·2 answers
  • Give 3 reasons why Filipinos did not become merchants in America.
    9·1 answer
  • Explain how the Supreme
    5·1 answer
  • 100 POINTS AND BRAINLIEST FOR ANSWER IN NEXT 10 mins will also give 5 star
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!