Yes.invention scientific instruments and Roman numerals numbers
Individuals with specifc phobia have an irrational fear of being publicly humiliated or embarrassed. - True
The fear of public humiliation is called the Social Phobia.
<h2>What is Social Phobia ?</h2>
An individual with social phobia, a type of anxiety disorder, has a strong fear of being embarrassed or humiliated in front of others.
Also, it is known as social anxiety disorder (SAD). In a social environment, in life situations, and in interactions with other people, it expresses the intense anxiety or fear of being judged, adversely regarded, or rejected.
When a person has a phobia, they will often shape their lives to avoid what they consider to be dangerous.
Phobias are diagnosable mental disorders.
The person will experience intense distress when faced with the source of their phobia. This may sometimes lead to panic attack.
Learn more about social phobia here :
brainly.com/question/9989687
#SPJ4
It is safe to say that as Madison was the "father" of the Constitution and Washington the "father of the powers of the Presidency," Marshall was the "father of the Supreme Court," almost single-handedly clarifying its powers.
Whenever a research is done, you must reject or accept a null hypothesis (the one you consider is not correct) or your work hypothesis (the theory you think is must probably accurate or close to the truth) usually, when performing a research, you will not always obtain positive or statistically significant results, that validate your hypothesis. Is actually, not unusual that extremes (or extraordinary results) come out (unexpected for several reasons: incorrect size of the sample, improper selection of the subjects- a bias- lack of correct determination of the variable measured or failure to determine the type of the variable-numerical, categorical, ratio,etc-)
Positive or negative results are yet, results whether they prove or reject your hypothesis. Failing to establish a scientific hypothesis does not necessarily mean that they did something wrong, it just says that the hypothesis tested does not approach correctly to the epistemological truth (ultimately, any research is only a mere approximation to reality). Therefore, when two scientists deny sharing<em> unusual results</em>, they are acting unethically, hiding results that can mean something from a different point of view.
reference
Nicholson, R. S. (1989). On being a scientist. Science, 246(4928), 305-306.