Hello.
-7h + 2(-4h + 5) > -4h + 1 + 10 ; solve for h
Our first step is to get rid of all the parenthesis. We can do this by simplifying everything out.
-7h - 8h + 10 > -4h + 11
Add like terms.
-15h + 10 > -4h + 11
Now, we must isolate our variables. We do this by moving all variables to one side and moving our other numbers to the other.
Subtract 10 from both sides. Then, add 4h to both sides.
-15h + 4h > 11 - 10
Simplify.
-h > 1
Divide both sides by -1.
However, keep in mind that when dividing with a negative, you must change the sign. Therefore, > turns into <
-h ÷ -1 < 1 ÷ -1
h < -1
Answer:
11
Step-by-step explanation:
g(x) = 2x + 7
Put x as 2 and evaluate.
g(2) = 2(2) + 7
Multiply.
g(2) = 4 + 7
Add the terms.
g(2) = 11
Answer: Choice B
There is not convincing evidence because the interval contains 0.
========================================================
Explanation:
The confidence interval is (-0.29, 0.09)
This is the same as writing -0.29 < p1-p1 < 0.09
The thing we're trying to estimate (p1-p2) is between -0.29 and 0.09
Because 0 is in this interval, it is possible that p1-p1 = 0 which leads to p1 = p2.
Therefore, it is possible that the population proportions are the same.
The question asks " is there convincing evidence of a difference in the true proportions", so the answer to this is "no, there isn't convincing evidence". We would need both endpoints of the confidence interval to either be positive together, or be negative together, for us to have convincing evidence that the population proportions are different.
Answer:
u=30
x=150
z=150
y=30
Step-by-step explanation:
u=y [ being vertically opposite angle]
x+u=180[ being linear pair]
x+30=180
x=180-30
x=150
z=x[being vertically opposite angle]
z=150
y=u[ being voa]
15% of gross = 630
0.15 G = 630
Divide each side by 0.15 :
G = 630/0.15 = $4,200
