Answer:
its in my queue
Explanation:
but are you actually good?
Answer:
C. Spencer will win because regardless of whether Glen was acting within the scope of his employment, Sally is liable for his negligence
Explanation:
Spencer will win the lawsuit and Sally is liable for negligence.
This is because, Sally was the person originally hired to do the roofing job.
She hired other workers to help her with the job, so she's liable to their actions and inactions.
Sally is operating under a working agreement (contract) and has already charged a fee of $10,000 so any punitive damages would be her responsibility.
Spencer was moving around and Glen threw some roofing shingles without any word of warning to people that might be in harm's way. So for Glenn's actions, Sally is liable for his negligence.
Answer:
B) $617,000
Explanation:
Issuance capital of 500,000 shall remain constant. Out of the current year net earnings 25000 we are paying 2000 as dividend so, that adds to the owners equity = 23000.
Total liabilities = total assets = 500000 + 23000 + 94000 = 617000
Answer:
Parenting.
Explanation:
The complexity of transitional business conditions creates a necessity for creating value through aggregation of various businesses in complex corporate enterprise, which provides it the character of a multi-business firm. Businesses may be defined as being regardless of the enterprise chooses to work as organizationally separate profit-responsible units. this can be primary done to create a fit between ways the business creation is been done.
Answer:
a. Counterclaim
Explanation:
Counterclaim is a claim by a defendant (the person be sued) against the plaintiff (the person who sues first).
Lyn is the plaintiff, who first sued Karl (the defendant). Karl's claim against the original plaintiff (Lyn) is an example of a counterclaim.
Another example is counterclaim by the city of Sandy Springs against Holder Construction Group, the company that built the city of Sandy Springs’ new City Springs complex.
Holder Construction Group earlier sued Sandy Springs city over disagreements on payments for the work.
The city filed a counterclaim to a superior Court, claiming that Holder Group should be denied payments until all work is done and for breach of contract, negligent construction and fraud.
