Answer:
expenditures and taxes
Explanation:
Fiscal policy refers to a government action to adjust taxes and expenditures to influence economic growth. Taxes are the main sources of income for the government. A rise in taxes increases revenue to the government but lower individual disposable income. High taxes discourage investments and business expansion.
Government expenditure in infrastructure and other projects creates employment and incomes in the economy. Reduced spending by the government may result in a lower aggregate demand. The government uses fiscal policies together with monetary policies to achieve its economic goals.
Answer: Analysis of company's performance by the management.
Explanation: In the management discussion and analysis, the upper management of the company analyze and comment on the qualitative and quantitative characteristic of a company. This is seen as a secondary information in the company's yearly financial statement.
The MD and A, is considered valuable by investors as sometimes the management also comments about the upcoming projects of the company in such statements.
Answer:
The correct answer to the following question will be Option B (design competition).
Explanation:
- Design competition seems to be a platform that allows participants to overcome a problem domain as well as compete against someone else, mostly their colleagues, to obtain an honor or perhaps a construction project.
- In comparison to the greatest design, arts as well as architecture blogs around the world, A' Design Recognition and Competition distributes every information throughout the design internet networks.
Some other available options have no connection with the given scenario. So choice B seems to be the right answer to that.
Answer:
Explanation:
1) The total cost of reducing runoff if the farmers are not allowed to trade permits is:
total loss = farmer A' loss + farmer B's loss
where:
- farmer A's loss = (100 - 50) x $25 = $1,250
- farmer B's loss = (100 - 50) x $50 = $2,500
total loss = $1,250 + $2,500 = $3,750
2) The total cost of reducing runoff if the farmers are allowed to trade permits is:
Since farmer A will be willing to sell his permits to farmer B for a price that is ≥ $25 and ≤ $50, the total cost of reducing runoff is $2,500.
If farmer A sells his runoff permit at a price higher than $25 his costs will decrease but farmer B's costs will increase, so any gain due to price change is offset by the other farmer's loss.
