Answer:
<h2>Kelly is wrong, with this congruent parts, we can conclude that triangles are congruent.</h2>
Step-by-step explanation:
To demonstrate congruent triangles, we need to use the proper postulates. There are at least 5 postulates we can use.
- Angle-Angle-Side Theorem (AAS theorem).
- Hypotenuse-Leg Theorem (HL theorem).
- Side-Side-Side Postulate (SSS postulate).
- Angle-Side-Angle Postulate (ASA postulate).
- Side-Angle-Side Postulate (SAS postulate).
In this case, Kelly SAS postulate, because the corresponding sides-angles-sides are congruent, i.e., KL ≅ MN and LM ≅ KN, also, all corresponding angles are congruent.
So, as you can see, only using SAS postulate, the congruency can be demonstrated. (Refer to the image attached to see an example of SAS postulate)
I believe B . Because it seems equivalent
Answer:
18x^5y
Step-by-step explanation:
Divide 36 by 2 first : 18
since you are dividing, you subtract the exponents:
x^8 - x^3= x^5
y^4-y^3= y^1 but you usually just write y
Step-by-step explanation:
Here's the first question and how to solve the second.
So the first business start with 250, that's your b in slope.
y = mx + b
y = mx + 250
Now, they charge 14 an hour so that's your m.
y = 14x + 250
x is the number of hours it takes.
The second business is straight up 22 per hour, so it's just y = mx, where b is 0.
y = 22x VS y = 14x + 250
Try plugging in different numbers and seeing how much it take to level out!
probably choice D is the most trust worthy but if im right please tell me