<u>Answer:</u>
When the subordinates have the characteristic of non-cooperation and lack interpersonal understanding, the democratic leadership style turns ineffective.
<u>Explanation:</u>
- Running a democracy is only possible through <em>utter cooperation</em> not only among the like-minded people, but also among the people bearing conflicts of thoughts with each other.
- If there is no cooperation among the players running the democracy, the democracy ends up being a mess rather than being a convenient mean of governance.
- As every single player in the democracy is significant for the functioning of the democracy, it is necessary that there is harmony among all the players responsible for the running of democracy.
In the late 1800's, economic, political and religious motives prompted European nations to expand their rule over other regions with the goal to make the empire bigger. The Industrial Revolution of the 1800's created a need for natural resources to fuel the newly invented machinery and transportation.
This is the most common system in nations that allow more than one political
party. Coalitions often break down when disputes arise. The answer is yes because most often there are chosen multiparty systems because because one party system usually don't get enough votes. As i sed before on multiparty systems there are disputes and this makes multiparty systems unstable.
Hope i helped. Peace ✌️
Answer:
<u>people who had already placed their bets,</u>
<u>they couldn't change their minds.</u>
Explanation:
In any competition, we are supposed to perform our best, and in competitions which involve personal judgements person participating in such competitions shall be sure of what they are putting in, what is their judgement.
Once the decision is taken by them, they shall stick to it and support and promote their decision. Same applies for the game of betting in race horses, as the ones who has already made the decision shall be sure about it.
And the ones who are still thinking about the correct horse invest in shall be confused and not confident on their choice.
It stopped people from trading and it weakened the society