I would say that for most people, buying an apartment or a house would be the most major thing they could do that would affect their net worth. Initially it would be mostly a liability at first but as it appreciates, especially if it is in a big city where the population keeps growing then it most likely will appreciate and then the owner's assets will increase since their equity will increase.
Answer:
Expense & revenue summary a/c (credit balance) = $3500
Explanation:
1. Dr Expense & revenue summary 52500
Cr Sales discount 1500
Cr Sales return & allowance 3000
Cr Depreciation expense 25000
Cr Salaries expense 23000
(Close expenses to expense & revenue summary a/c)
2. Dr Sales 56000
Cr Expense & revenue summary 56000
(Close sales to expense & revenue summary a/c)
3. Dr Expense & revenue summary a/c 3500
Cr Retained earning a/c 3500
(To close expense & revenue summary a/c)
4. Dr Retained earning 2000
Cr Expense & revenue summary 2000
(Close dividend to expense & revenue summary a/c)d
Answer:
I think industrial markets
Answer:
56.46%
Explanation:
The computation of the gross profit percentage is shown below
Gross profit percentage is
= (Sales - cost of goods sold) ÷ (Sales) × 100
where,
Sales is $850,000
And, the cost of goods sold is $344,600
Now placing these values to the above formula
So, the gross profit percentage is
= ($850,000 - $344,600) ÷ ($850,000) × 100
= $505,400 ÷ $850,000 × 100
= 56.46%
Answer:
Option (D) is correct.
Explanation:
In United states:
Can produce 25 tons of steel or 250 automobiles,
Opportunity cost of producing a ton of steel = 250 ÷ 25
= 10 automobiles
Opportunity cost of producing 1 automobile = 25 ÷ 250
= 0.1 tons of steel
In Japan:
Can produce 30 tons of steel or 275 automobiles,
Opportunity cost of producing a ton of steel = 275 ÷ 30
= 9.17 automobiles
Opportunity cost of producing 1 automobile = 30 ÷ 275
= 0.11
Therefore,
United States has a comparative advantage in producing automobiles because the opportunity cost of producing automobiles is lower than the Japan.
Japan has a comparative advantage in producing steel because the opportunity cost of producing steel is lower than the United states.
