Answer:
yes by aa
Step-by-step explanation:
1-39 ODD:
1,3,5,7,9,11,13,15,17,19,21,23,25,27,29,31,33,35,37,39
Now you'd add them all up.
1+3+5+7+9 = 25
11+13+15+17+19 = 75
21+23+25+27+29 = 125
31+33+35+37+39 = 175
Add the totals:
25+75+125+175
The answer would be 400.
The theorem that justifies why triangles ABC and DEF are congruent is: HL.
<h3>What is the Hypotenuse-Leg Congruence Theorem (HL)?</h3>
The hypotenuse-leg congruence theorem (HL) states that if two triangles that are right triangles have a pair of congruent hypotenuse and a pair of corresponding congruent legs, then both right triangles are proven to be congruent to each other. This means both right triangles are have the same shape and size.
Given that:
angle ABC = angle DEF = 90° (congruent right angles, this means both triangles are right triangles)
AC = FD (a pair of congruent hypotenuse)
AB = DE (a pair of congruent legs)
Thus, we can conclude that since triangle ABC and triangle DEF have a pair of congruent hypotenuses and a pair of congruent legs, therefore, the two right triangles, triangle ABC and triangle DEF are congruent to each other by the HL congruent theorem.
Thus, the theorem that justifies why both triangles are congruent is: HL.
Learn more about the HL congruence theorem on:
brainly.com/question/2102943
#SPJ1
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
8 miles
Step-by-step explanation:
I'm going to assume the question said that she "couldn't" repair the tire and was forced to walk back home, that makes more sense.
With that in mind:
She rode her bike 2 miles.
She walked 4 miles on the way there, and 6 miles on the way back.
You can deduce that it was a 6 mile walk back because of the 2 mile bike ride, then the 4 mile walk that it took to get there.
All in all that rounds out to 10 mile walking, and 2 mile biking. That is 8 miles more walking than biking.
