In this paragraph from an interpretive literary analysis of William Shakespeare's Hamlet, the term <em>allusion</em> should be changed to the term <em>irony</em>.
This is a very common literary device where a state of affairs or events end up being the contrary to what the readers expect and often amazes the audience.
In this particular part of the play, Hamlet, who is supposed to kill Laertes with his sword, ends up being hurted and poisoned by his own sword. His lack of attention ends with his life at the same moment he ends Laerte's.
This is a very unexpected outcome because Hamlet was about to fulfill his will, but because of his inattention, the situation ends with his life as well.
Answer:
1.Use literary quotes.
2.Write a quote from a famous person.
3.Surprise with a misconception.
4.Write an anecdote.
5.Tell a personal story.
6.Use statistical data.
7.Ask a question.
8.Share a fact or a definition.
The compromising conflict style is often referred to as the “lose-lose” method. When you address conflict with this style, you encourage each side to make some significant sacrifices. By definition, this means that neither side gets exactly what they want
My friend, Alex, plays tennis.
My = possessive pronoun
friend = subject
Alex = an appositive (which is a noun that renames another noun right beside it) -- though not an adjective, it functions like one to explain which friend
plays = verb
tennis = direct object
hope this helps :)
