B. It brought about the unconditional surrender of Japan.
Not A, the bombs were dropped instead of invading, which had a very high estimated casualty rate if the US did.
Not C, Germany eventually faltered and caved in, and then surrendered in the European Theater.
Not D, the Japanese Empire was using Kamikaze attacks longs before Atomic weapons were developed.
Answer:
2. to form neutral alliances
Explanation:
The question is incomplete, so the complete question is as follows:
What is an example of a reason why historical interpretations may change over time?
A. Archeologists may uncover new climate evidence.
B. Political scientists discover a new method of scientific research.
C. Economists may learn more about how ancient governments operated.
D. New X-ray technology proves that previous medical conclusions were incorrect.
Answer:
A). Archeologists may uncover new climate evidence.
Explanation:
The Archeologists works to reveal several historical interpretations on thebasis of facts gathered from primary sources of evidence.
The example that [roves chnaging interpretation over time by archeologists is that they may uncover new climate evidence which can change the earlier facts and can reveal several new things. Archeologists can change tehir views whenever they will find some new and more strong evidences.
Hence, the correct option is "A".
Jerusalem and Constantinople
Answer:
Congress passed 4 laws known as Alien and Sedition Acts. The federalist policies was disloyal and feared that aliens living in the United States would sympathize with the French during a war.
