Your classmate's error about AB and DC being complimentary and parallel is that they misapplied the alternate angle property.
<h3>Why are AB and DC not parallel?</h3><h3 />
There isn't enough evidence presented in the diagram to say that AB and DC are parallel.
The evidence required would be proof that angle AWZ is equal to angle WZY.
Instead, all we have is that angle AWZ and angle XYC are equal which does not tell us what we need to know about AB and DC being parallel.
Find out more on properties of parallel lines at brainly.com/question/24607467
#SPJ1
Answer:
aasha here it is.
Step-by-step explanation:
3x−1)(2x+3)
6x2+7x−3
=6x2+9x−2x−3
=3x(2x+3)−1(2x+3)
=(2x+3)(3x−1)
and hiii
Answer: It's cool, it means I get free points :)
answer:
23 and 32 are not symmetrical primes because they are not prime numbers
Answer:
£10386.34
Step-by-step explanation:
The amount in an account for a principal P saved at compound interest for a period of n years at an annual rate of r% is calculated using the formula:
In this case:
Principal, P=£9500
r=1.8%=0.018
n=5 years
Therefore:
At the end of 5 years, Annie will have £10386.34
