1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mrs_skeptik [129]
3 years ago
13

Sal and two of his friends rent an apartment together. Their total cost to move in included first month's rent, last month's ren

t and a security deposit of $1,200. If Sal paid a total of $1,000 to move in, how much is his share of the rent each month? a. $300 b. $450 c. $600 d. $900
Mathematics
2 answers:
umka2103 [35]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

A. $300

Step-by-step explanation:

Test on Edge - Sarah Robinsen <3

VMariaS [17]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Option a. $300

Step-by-step explanation:

Let

x ----> the cost of the rent monthly per person

we know that

The number of persons is 3 (Sal and two friends)

The cost of the security deposit per person is equal to

\$1,200/3=\$400

If Sal paid a total of $1,000 to move in

then

That means that the cost per person of two months of rent (first and last month) plus $400 (security deposit per person) must be equal to $1,000

2x+400=1,000

solve for x

2x=1,000-400\\2x=600\\x=\$300

You might be interested in
Select the assumption necessary to start an indirect proof of the statement. If 3a+7 &lt; 28, then a&lt;7.
pashok25 [27]
When applying indirect proofs, we assume the negation of the conclusion is true, and show that this assumption would lead to nonsense, or contradiction.

In our case we assume a is not smaller than 7, that is we assume a≥7.

a≥7 then, multiplying both sides by 3:
3a≥21, then, adding both sides 7:

3a+7≥28,

which is a contradiction because 3a+7 is smaller than 28.

So our assumption is wrong, which means the opposite of it is correct.


Answer: assume a≥7
7 0
3 years ago
(9+8)+6/3-7×2 how to slove
klemol [59]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

There is a specific order to do these kind of problems..

first, we do everything in parenthesis...

(9 + 8) + 6/3 - 7 * 2

17 + 6/3 - 7 * 2

now, starting from the LEFT side, do all multiplication and division in the order it comes

17 + 2 - 14

now, starting from the LEFT side, do all addition and subtraction in the order it comes

19 - 14 = 4

so ur answer is 4

Learn this...order of operations....this is the order u do these problems in..

PEMDAS

P = parenthesis

E = exponents

M = multiplication

D = division

A = addition

S = subtraction

keep in mind, multiplication/division are done from left to right....u do not have to do multiplication before u do division....it just depends on which comes first when starting from the left side.....that also applies to addition/subtraction

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the percentage change in total number of players from Tram A 2021 to 2022 when more than 6 but less 20 matches where won
babunello [35]

Answer:

46%

Step-by-step explanation:

You subtract the old by new then devide by the old and multiply by 100%

8 0
2 years ago
What is the volume of this figure? <br> Plz answer soon! <br> (iready)
Lena [83]
Answer:

Volume = 1730 in^2

Step-by-step explanation:

18 - 5 = 13

6 + 5 = 11

10 x 13 x 11 = 1430

10 x 5 x 6 = 300

1430 + 300 = 1730
8 0
2 years ago
Prove that if n is a perfect square then n + 2 is not a perfect square
notka56 [123]

Answer:

This statement can be proven by contradiction for n \in \mathbb{N} (including the case where n = 0.)

\text{Let $n \in \mathbb{N}$ be a perfect square}.

\textbf{Case 1.} ~ \text{n = 0}:

\text{$n + 2 = 2$, which isn't a perfect square}.

\text{Claim verified for $n = 0$}.

\textbf{Case 2.} ~ \text{$n \in \mathbb{N}$ and $n \ne 0$. Hence $n \ge 1$}.

\text{Assume that $n$ is a perfect square}.

\text{$\iff$ $\exists$ $a \in \mathbb{N}$ s.t. $a^2 = n$}.

\text{Assume $\textit{by contradiction}$ that $(n + 2)$ is a perfect square}.

\text{$\iff$ $\exists$ $b \in \mathbb{N}$ s.t. $b^2 = n + 2$}.

\text{$n + 2 > n > 0$ $\implies$ $b = \sqrt{n + 2} > \sqrt{n} = a$}.

\text{$a,\, b \in \mathbb{N} \subset \mathbb{Z}$ $\implies b - a = b + (- a) \in \mathbb{Z}$}.

\text{$b > a \implies b - a > 0$. Therefore, $b - a \ge 1$}.

\text{$\implies b \ge a + 1$}.

\text{$\implies n+ 2 = b^2 \ge (a + 1)^2= a^2 + 2\, a + 1 = n + 2\, a + 1$}.

\text{$\iff 1 \ge 2\,a $}.

\text{$\displaystyle \iff a \le \frac{1}{2}$}.

\text{Contradiction (with the assumption that $a \ge 1$)}.

\text{Hence the original claim is verified for $n \in \mathbb{N}\backslash\{0\}$}.

\text{Hence the claim is true for all $n \in \mathbb{N}$}.

Step-by-step explanation:

Assume that the natural number n \in \mathbb{N} is a perfect square. Then, (by the definition of perfect squares) there should exist a natural number a (a \in \mathbb{N}) such that a^2 = n.

Assume by contradiction that n + 2 is indeed a perfect square. Then there should exist another natural number b \in \mathbb{N} such that b^2 = (n + 2).

Note, that since (n + 2) > n \ge 0, \sqrt{n + 2} > \sqrt{n}. Since b = \sqrt{n + 2} while a = \sqrt{n}, one can conclude that b > a.

Keep in mind that both a and b are natural numbers. The minimum separation between two natural numbers is 1. In other words, if b > a, then it must be true that b \ge a + 1.

Take the square of both sides, and the inequality should still be true. (To do so, start by multiplying both sides by (a + 1) and use the fact that b \ge a + 1 to make the left-hand side b^2.)

b^2 \ge (a + 1)^2.

Expand the right-hand side using the binomial theorem:

(a + 1)^2 = a^2 + 2\,a + 1.

b^2 \ge a^2 + 2\,a + 1.

However, recall that it was assumed that a^2 = n and b^2 = n + 2. Therefore,

\underbrace{b^2}_{=n + 2)} \ge \underbrace{a^2}_{=n} + 2\,a + 1.

n + 2 \ge n + 2\, a + 1.

Subtract n + 1 from both sides of the inequality:

1 \ge 2\, a.

\displaystyle a \le \frac{1}{2} = 0.5.

Recall that a was assumed to be a natural number. In other words, a \ge 0 and a must be an integer. Hence, the only possible value of a would be 0.

Since a could be equal 0, there's not yet a valid contradiction. To produce the contradiction and complete the proof, it would be necessary to show that a = 0 just won't work as in the assumption.

If indeed a = 0, then n = a^2 = 0. n + 2 = 2, which isn't a perfect square. That contradicts the assumption that if n = 0 is a perfect square, n + 2 = 2 would be a perfect square. Hence, by contradiction, one can conclude that

\text{if $n$ is a perfect square, then $n + 2$ is not a perfect square.}.

Note that to produce a more well-rounded proof, it would likely be helpful to go back to the beginning of the proof, and show that n \ne 0. Then one can assume without loss of generality that n \ne 0. In that case, the fact that \displaystyle a \le \frac{1}{2} is good enough to count as a contradiction.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • HELLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLPPPPPPP PLEASE! Is the number 4.78 a solution of x &lt; 5? Is the number 6 a solution of x &lt; 6? PLEASE EXPL
    15·1 answer
  • Is all the answer correct if not plz write the number and correct answer with work thank you and asap
    14·2 answers
  • Find the zeros : x(x^2+13x+40)
    8·1 answer
  • On a straight road, a car speeds up at a constant rate from rest to 20 m/s over a 5 second interval and a truck slows at a const
    13·1 answer
  • a rocket is scheduled to launch from a command center in 3.75 hours. what time is it now if launch time is 11:20am. i need to kn
    12·2 answers
  • What is the absolute value of -8 and 8?
    5·2 answers
  • At what rate of interest whould rs 1800 amount to 2500 in 2 years
    6·1 answer
  • A teacher asks each student in the class to randomly choose a number between 1 and 80 and write it down. Devon and Michiko write
    7·2 answers
  • Which function matches the graph?
    8·2 answers
  • What is the answer to the escape room
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!