In a way, all of the answers could be argued for (for example: in the first option: if the scientists' opinions are understood to be "informed understanding of the causes of events"), but one of the options is the best:
Scientific laws describe specific relationships in nature without offering
an explanation.
The reason why I think this is true is that many laws are phased too short and too concise to provide comprehensive explanations, instead they describe the relationships that must hold.
One of the options is pplain false:
Scientific laws explain why natural events occur. -"Scientific laws were theories that have been tested, proven, and adopted as laws." - since they are not adopted as laws.
Answer:
John Dalton, an English chemist, meteorologist, and physicists, was best known for his development of the modern atomic theory
Explanation:
Answer: Read through this, hope It helps
Explanation:
Covalent bonds are formed when nonmetals form compounds with each other by sharing electrons between them.
Ionic bonds are formed when one ion — an atom or molecule with a net charge, either positive or negative — finds another ion of the opposite charge to bond with, creating an overall neutral ionic compound.
In a reaction, molecular entity that is formed from the reactants. For example, consider this hypothetical stepwise reaction: A + B → C + D.
