Ummm...4?
Am I stupid or something, that is a simple subtraction problem right? 6-2=4?
I am so confused, but okay.
Your answer is 4 cups.
Answer:
Yeahh
Step-by-step explanation:
Write the statement in one side and give the reasons on other side.
And then proof it by accurate reason
Answer: Option C

Step-by-step explanation:
To solve this problem use the properties of the logarithms.
We know that the inverse function of
is
.
So when composing the function with its inverse function we have to:
.
Now apply this property on both sides of the equation

the answer is the option C
A quadratic equation is one in which the highest exponent of x is 2.

is quadratic; the highest exponent is 2.
x³-3x²+1=0 is NOT quadratic. The highest exponent of x is 3, not 2.
5x-7=0 is NOT quadratic. The highest exponent of x is 1, not 2.
x²+3x-5=0 is quadratic; the highest exponent of x is 2.
x-5=9x+7 is NOT quadratic. The highest exponent of x is 1, not 2.
x²-x=3x+7 is quadratic; the highest exponent of x is 2.
Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:
We have been given that an arrow is shot straight up from a cliff 58.8 meters above the ground with an initial velocity of 49 meters per second. Let up be the positive direction. Because gravity is the force pulling the arrow down, the initial acceleration of the arrow is −9.8 meters per second squared.
We know that equation of an object's height t seconds after the launch is in form
, where
g = Force of gravity,
= Initial velocity,
= Initial height.
For our given scenario
,
and
. Upon substituting these values in object's height function, we will get:

Therefore, the function for the height of the arrow would be
.