Let's pick some simple points with which to set up an example for ourselves for this. Let's let the smaller radius be 1, and the larger, twice that, be 2. The radius itself is a single unit measure; in other words, it's measured as inches, feet, cm, etc., while the volume is a cubed measure. Volume is measured in inches cubed, feet cubed, cm cubed, etc. Therefore, if we have the radii measuring 1:2, we simply cube those single unit measures to find the ratio of their volumes. 1 cubed is 1, and 2 cubed is 8. So your answer for this is 1/8.
Three hundred and six thousandths :)
Well it technically won’t be be because it isn’t b
Answer:
Follows are the responses to the given question:
Step-by-step explanation:
Please find the complete question in the attached file.



The stem & leaf show demonstrates that 0.55 for both the data is indeed a reasonable value.
The probable outlier is the data value 0.76.
The variability of the techniques is relatively large.
It show isn't symmetrical and seems to be optimistic.