- Answer & step-by-step explanation:
<em>a) impossible</em>
<em>b) the sum of the angles in a triangle is 180°</em>
<em>63° + 59° + 57° = 179°</em>
Answer:
213 1/3
Step-by-step explanation:
Because I know where you got this question from.
–2x<span> + 6. (</span>f<span> – </span>g)(x<span>) = </span>f<span> (</span>x<span>) – </span>g(x). = [3x + 2] – [4 – 5x]. = 3x + 2 – 4 + 5x. = 3x + 5x + 2 – 4. = 8x – 2. (f<span> × </span>g)(x) = [f<span> (</span>x)][g(x)]. = (3x + 2)(4 – 5x). = 12x + 8 – 15x2<span> – 10x ... of the </span>functions<span> at </span>x<span> = 2 and then work from there. It's probably simpler in this case to evaluate first, so: </span>f<span> (2) = 2(2) = 4. </span>g(2) = (2) + 4 = 6. h(2) = 5<span> – (2)</span>3<span> = 5 – 8 = –</span><span>3</span>
Answer:
option B
Step-by-step explanation:
Regression models are not usually made use of if the need is to predict population, which has to do with number present as well as the stocks of large companies and so on, reason being that their variable levels or confidence interval are usually out of range of those used for a regression
I think it’s all real numbers
