Answer:
5
Step-by-step explanation:
Since we have not instructed to follow any kind of rule dividing, we can write in any form. Let's calculate it using fraction
We can multiply both the nominator and denominator with 100
The answer is 5.
We can also solve it as a division of fractions:
$1000 - ($20 + $20) = $60
$60 / $10 = 6 paper weights
if you look at the part where the first part connects with the second part:
y = 5 if x < - 2
y = -2x + 1 if -2 ≤ x < 1
we don't have a discontinuity there, so there shouldn't be a dot.
<h3>
</h3><h3>
What is wrong with the graph?</h3>
When we graph over intervals like (a, b) or [a, b] or something like that, we use dots to define the end of the intervals, and to denote that the function ends abruptly or we have a jump.
In this case, you can see that between the end and the second part and the beginning of the third part there is a jump, so the use of dots is correct there, but if you look at the part where the first part connects with the second part:
y = 5 if x < - 2
y = -2x + 1 if -2 ≤ x < 1
we don't have a discontinuity there, so there shouldn't be a dot.
That is the only error with the graph.
If you want to learn more about piecewise functions:
brainly.com/question/3628123
#SPJ1
The proof is given below. Please go through it.
Step-by-step explanation:
To solve Δ ABC ≅ Δ DBC
From Δ ABC and Δ DBC
AB = BD (given)
AC = CD (given)
BC is common side
By SSS condition Δ ABC ≅ Δ DBC ( proved)
To solve Δ EHF ≅ Δ GHF
Δ EHF and Δ GHF
EH = HG ( given)
∠ EFH = ∠ GFH ( each angle is 90°)
HF is common side
By RHS condition
Δ EHF ≅ Δ GHF