I think the summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case
Summary judgement is entered by the court if the plaintiff does not have sufficient evidence that the defendants actually do what they're accused of before moving to trial.
On this case, There is a strong proof that peoples restaurant is aware of Hoag's alcoholism : <u>intoxicated</u>
This mean that sabo can proof that the bar know hoag is an alcoholic and had served enough amount to hoag to get him intoxicated.
This mean that Sabo's case is strong enough to be brought to the trial. keep in mind that Sabo is unlikely to win the trial since the restaurant does not directly involved in the accident. but we can definitely say that summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case.
Answer:He wrote the political guidebook. It impacted renaissance Europe by serving as a uniform set of laws. When you went a against these laws you were executed
Explanation: I just learned this in history like not that long ago.
Answer:
Sedimentary rocks such as limestone or shale are hardened sediment with sandy or clay-like layers (strata). They are usually brown to gray in color and may have fossils and water or wind marks. Metamorphic rocks such as marble are tough, with straight or curved layers (foliation) of light and dark minerals.
Explanation:
Answer:
I will cite the independent Gallup opinion poll
Explanation:
Ethics is the ability of a person to take the right action in a given situation and reject wrong action.
In the given scenario where there are two opinion polls, one an independent on by Gallup and another by a partisan organisation.
The best option will be to cite the independent opinion poll by Gallup even if though it opposes your position.
You can however state solid facts that shows the relevance of your own position.
This gives the audience a transparent view of the facts and they can make decisions knowing they are not being lied to.
Answer:
i cant see it
Explanation:..................
