This statement is false. The loan period does get to affect the total cost of the loan. Loans tend to have an annual percentage rate applied to it when you had it. It is a term used to refer the interest rate of the loan you had acquired.
Answer: is increased by credits
Explanation:
Revenue accounts are increased by credits because they are an equity account and equity accounts increase by credit. This is because the corresponding entry would be an asset such as cash and as the asset has to increase by being debited, revenue must be increased by credit.
Other accounts that are increased by credit include liabilities. Accounts that increase by debits apart from assets include purchases and expenses.
Answer:
![d+n=35\\0.10d+0.05n=3.30](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=d%2Bn%3D35%5C%5C0.10d%2B0.05n%3D3.30)
Explanation:
Multiple Choices aren't given, so I will just solve this.
Josiah had "d" dimes and "n" nickels.
There are a total of 35 coins, nickels and dimes.
The value of "d" dimes and "n" nickels is $3.30
Note: Value of nickels is 0.05 and dimes is 0.10 (in dollars)
The system of equations (2) we can use to solve this will be:
1) an equation involving total number of coins
2) an equation stating the value of each coin and total value
Equation 1:
![d + n = 35](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=d%20%2B%20n%20%3D%2035)
Equation 2:
![0.10d+0.05n=3.30](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=0.10d%2B0.05n%3D3.30)
These are the 2 equations that can be solved simulataneously to find the number of nickels and dimes.
Answer:
The current price of Hubbard's common stock is <u>$25.50</u>.
Explanation:
This can be calculated using the Gordon growth model (GGM) formula that assumes growth is dividend will be constant as follows:
P = D1/(r - g) ............................ (1)
Where,
P = Current stock price = ?
D1 = Next dividend = D0 * (1 + g) = $1.50 * (1 + 2%) = $1.53
r = required return = 8%, or 0.08
g = growth rate = 2%, or 0.02
Substituting the values into equation (1), we have:
P = $1.53 / (0.08 - 0.02) = $25.50
Therefore, the current price of Hubbard's common stock is <u>$25.50</u>.
Answer:
The statement is not an express warranty, because it doesn't involve a negotiation of terms between Salazar and Mitsubishi. It is an employee of the company that imploy Salazar to bring the car should the car gives problem, and didn't involve an agreement between the two parties ( Salazar and Mitsubishi)
Explanation:
What is express warranty?
An express warranty arises from the parties’ negotiations in a sales transaction. Express warranties are often included in the written terms of a contract. An “express” warranty by a seller is created by:
Any statement of fact or promise relating to the goods sold which becomes part of the basis of the bargain between the parties, creating a warranty that the goods will conform to the statement or promise.
Any description of the goods sold which becomes part of the basis of the bargain between the parties, creating a warranty that the goods will conform to the description.
Any sample or model, which becomes part of the basis of the bargain between the parties, creating a warranty that the goods will conform to the sample or model.
An express warranty may be created even if the seller does not use formal words such as “warranty” or “guarantee,” and even if the seller does not have a specific intention to make a warranty. However, an express warranty is not created merely because the seller makes a statement as to the value of the goods, or as to seller’s opinion of the goods. Generally, statements made by a seller during the course of contract negotiations are treated as statements of fact, unless it can be shown that the buyer could only have reasonably considered the statement to be an opinion.