After lab-reared monkeys saw their parents fearfully avoid reaching for food located near a snake, the younger monkeys developed a strong fear of snakes. The younger monkeys' fear of snakes resulted from observational learning.
<h3> What do you understand by
observational learning?</h3>
Observing and imitating another person's actions, attitudes, or emotional outbursts is the learning strategy known as observational learning.
As an illustration, a child picks up on many facial expressions by watching his or her mother. An infant picks up walking through observation. After witnessing a coworker get fired for being late, a fresh employee is now always on time.
The value of observational learning lies in assisting people, particularly children, in developing new reactions by observing the behavior of others. According to Albert Bandura, a person's environment may have an impact on their conduct. Through observing both bad and positive behaviors, observational learning takes place.
Four distinct processes are involved in learning by observation:
- production,
- motivation,
- retention,
- and attention.
To know more about observational learning refer to: brainly.com/question/26573755
#SPJ4
Run-off from pavement or smooth rock during rainfall is much greater and faster than run-off from soil or other surfaces as there is little obstruction (friction) to the water flow. These surfaces also absorb very little water, meaning that there is a larger amount of run-off.
This means that waterways can have to deal with large intakes of water in a very short amount of time, often leading to flash flooding, as the waterway can not handle such a large amount of water at once.
Answer: The origin of the case was somewhat trivial, but had great implications for the role of the Supreme Court in government. Marbury was appointed by John Adams, the president before Madison, as a district judge in Washington DC. When Madison became president, he didn't deliver the papers to finalize Marbury's appointment.
Marbury took him to Court, and although the Court initially sided with Marbury, the court, with John Marshall serving as Chief Justice, ultimately determined that the law that allowed Marbury to take the case to court was not constitutional. This meant that the law was struck down.
This was the first incidence of the Supreme Court exercising judicial review, the review of laws to determine constitutionality and their rejection if they are not, in the history of the United States. It was a landmark case not for the spat between Marbury and Madison over a district judgeship, but because it marked a huge expansion of the power of the Supreme Court (and thus the judicial branch).
We have seen the power of judicial review exercised in many cases since this one, such as Miranda vs Arizona (which established the law that police must read you your 'Miranda Rights' when they arrest you) and Plessy vs Ferguson, which determined that laws governing "seperate but equal" facilities for people of different races were in theory inherently unequal, and in practice clearly offered worse facilities to people of color.
My duty was to smuggle the pearls from my mom's drawer.
