Answer:
you need at least a score of 60
Step-by-step explanation:
anything 59 and below is 1.95 and every percent higher it adds .5 more
Answer:
Null hypothesis is: U1 - U2 ≤ 0
Alternative hypothesis is U1 - U2 > 0
Step-by-step explanation:
The question involves a comparison of the two types of training given to the salespeople. The requirement is to set up the hypothesis that type A training leads to higher mean weakly sales compared to type B training.
Let U1 = mean sales by type A trainees
Let U2 = mean sales by type B trainees
Therefore, the null hypothesis (H0) is: U1 - U2 ≤ 0
This implies that type A training does not result in higher mean weekly sales than type B training.
The alternative hypothesis (H1) is: U1 - U2 > 0
This implies that type A training indeed results in higher mean weekly sales than type B training.
The y-intercept on the x-y plane is (0, -9).
<h3 /><h3>How to get the y-intercept?</h3>
To get the y-intercept we just need to evaluate in x = 0.
Here we have:
y = 6*(x - 1/2)*(x + 3)
Evaluating the given equation in x = 0 we get:
y = 6*(0 - 1/2)*(0 + 3) = -9
Then the y-intercept on the x-y plane is (0, -9).
If you want to learn more about y-intercepts:
brainly.com/question/1884491
#SPJ1
Answer:
The number of different possible poker hands is found by counting the number of ways that 5 cards can be selected from 52 cards, where the order is not important. It is a combination, so we use c n r
Step-by-step explanation:
The possible number of the poker hands is probably . C 52 5= 52!/5!x47!= 2598960