Answer:
c. May be able to avoid liability to the extent she had no reason to know of the deficiency (and did not have actual knowledge) when filing the return. The burden of proof will be on her.
Explanation:
The doctrine of <em>innocent spouse relief</em> might apply here. Mrs. Jones will have to prove that:
- the income that was omitted was earned by her husband, not her.
- she must prove that when she signed the tax filings, she was not aware of the omission.
- after examining all the facts surrounding the omission, the IRS must decide that blaming her would not be fair.
Answer: The fringe benefit is worth $182 more than the additional salary.
Explanation:
The Fringe benefit is valued at $3,600.
The additional salary after taxes is:
= 5,000 - (5,000 * 24%) - (5,000 * 7.65%)
= 5,000 - 1,200 - 382.5
= $3,418
The Fringe benefit is worth more than the salary by:
= 3,600 - 3,418
= $182
<em>Options are more probably for a variant of this question. </em>
It's hehhdfsjgsisgdsjsb,gvsjsvgsgejdnxgndjdgdusjehgsnskhsgzjosbdjd there's the answer XD
Answer:
= 18.7%
Explanation:
<em>A portfolio is a collection of assets/ investment. The return on a portfolio is the weighted average of all the return of the individual assets weighted according to the percentage of total funds allocated to each assets.</em>
Expected return on portfolio:
E(R) =( Wa*Ra) + (Wb*Rb)
Wa = 56% , Wb = 100-56 = 44%
Ra = 12%, Rb = 24%
E(R) = (0.56*24%) + (0.44× 12%)
= 18.7%
Answer:
Equilibrium is the point of the interaction between the demand and supply curves.
The given graph given from the question is attached below (Image 1-2)
The solution is attached in image 3-4
