Simply put, by coercion.
There was a very simple process that followed:
(1) the Red Army invades the countries, on the pretext of "liberating" them - this gives a plausible veneer to a treacherous end;
(2) whilst occupying, Soviet commissars would prop up the local communist party (typically, enjoying only minimal support from the country's population, unless also nationalist) - this is so as to have a puppet regime-in-waiting;
(3) under Soviet occupation, typically some sort of a "referendum" or "plebiscite" will be held, at which SUDDENLY the voters will "decide" to abolish the previous constitution and to enact one that practically gives sole powers to the local communists - this is to give the effective coup d'etat a veneer of legitimacy;
(4) once installed in power, the communist party will effectively take over the machinery of state by staffing all key posts with its members;
(5) through the use of secret police and kangaroo courts, opposition, incl. those of the original governing class who did not have the good sense to escape, will be physically eliminated, sentenced to long prison terms, exiled, otherwise incarcerated;
(6) a the takeover of the state is usually followed by a takeover, through nationalisation or outright confiscation, of the economy, giving the regime financial muscle;
<span>(7) the established position will be upheld by the same means it was acquired and with unparalleled degree of ruthlessness, with the country taken over being treated as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Kremlin Holdings.</span>
Answer: The challenges of immigration are, more often than not, negotiated in the context of the family (Carranza 2001). Therefore, research in family studies needs to encompass the family as a unit of analysis as well as the patterns of resistance that family members develop in order to bounce back in an unwelcoming environment.
Explanation: A purposive sample was chosen in order to provide some diversity to the range of the accounts regarding mother–daughter negotiation. The purposive sample provided richness along many dimensions such as socio-economic-political religious affiliations, migration paths, etc. The sample design was fairly complex involving two sets of participants. Each of the two sets included mothers and their daughters. Participants in these sets were interviewed individually.These two sets were: (i) The Mother–Adolescent
Daughter Set which included Salvadorian immigrant mothers and at least one of their adolescent daughters between the ages of 15 and 17 years who were born in Canada or abroad; and (ii) The Mother–Adult Daughter Set which included Salvadorian immigrant mothers and at least one of their adult daughters between the ages of 19 and 30 years who grew up in Canada or arrived before becoming an adolescent. Mothers and daughters in these two groups were interviewed individually because ‘in-depth interviews provided the possibility to learn to see the world from the eyes of the person being interviewed’ (Ely 1991, p. 58). These in-depth conversations allowed obtaining information about the participants’ individual perceptions regarding their positioning as they settled into Canadian context.
To learn more about racism and immigration refer:-
brainly.com/question/8308669?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ2
A republic is a confederation of independent state governments that form a large federal government. In a republic, the people choose who will govern them. These people are known as representatives. Thus answer 2 is correct.
Justinian's Code, or the Corpus Juris Civilis, is a piece of the establishment of present day Western law. It fills in as the establishment for both the Napoleonic Code and the Germanistic code. These two codes of common law have impacted the improvement of law in numerous nations around the globe.
In Justinian's time, the Corpus played out the significant capacity of bringing together legitimate guidelines over his realm. In the Renaissance, the Corpus began to impact Roman ordinance law and global law.
At last, the Corpus is a basic hotspot for researchers. It gives a very composed and complete gathering of laws and lawful works from the most significant Classical creators.
The initial segment of the Corpus was the Codex. This was a gathering of the considerable number of mandates issued by past rulers. Justinian's researchers needed to dispose of copy, out of date, or generally dangerous laws so as to make an assortment of laws that were reasonable for the Byzantine Empire as it existed in the sixth century CE. Later on, Justinian needed to issue his own laws, called the Novellae Constitutiones, to increase the Codes. The Novellae are viewed as the fourth and last piece of the Corpus.
The other two pieces of the Corpus gave editorial and preparing in elucidation. The second part was known as the Digesta. The Digesta was a huge accumulation of determinations from the editorials of significant legal scholars. This shaped the reason for the elucidation of the laws. The third part was the Institutiones, which was a manual for utilizing the Codex and Digesta.
