Answer:
The Tumult of Aranjuez (Spanish: Motín de Aranjuez) was an uprising led against King Charles IV that took place in the town of Aranjuez, Spain, on 17–19 March 1808. The event, which is celebrated annually in the first week of September, commemorates the fall of the monarch and the subsequent accession of his son Ferdinand VII.[1] It is celebrated in September rather than in March as the revived celebrations in Aranjuez that began in 1988 were added on top of pre-existing September festivals.[2]
<h2>
DATE</h2>
17–19 March 180
<h2>
LOCATION</h2>
Aranjuez, Spain
<h2>
RESULT</h2>
Mutineer victory
Mutineer victoryFall of Manuel de Godoy from power
Abdication of Charles IV, and later the Abdications of Bayonne
French occupation of Madrid, and later the Dos de Mayo Uprising
Explanation:
I translated your question btw hahaha
HOPE IT HELPS
A debate from the perspective of a Northerner over Missouri Statehood would be one talking about the importance of limiting slavery.
A argument from a Southerner would be one arguing that Northerners should allow slavery in states that want slavery.
<h3>What were the arguments for Missouri Statehood?</h3>
Missouri wanted to gain admission into the Union as a slave state and the North did not want this because they were against slavery spreading to other parts of the Union.
Southerners on the other hand, wanted slavery in Missouri as they believed that it would increase the power of slave states in Congress. They therefore argued that territories such as Missouri that wanted slavery, should be free to have slavery.
Find out more on Missouri Statehood at brainly.com/question/1855671.
