Answer:
The Monroe Doctrine was to prevent further European colonization in the Western Hemisphere.
Explanation:
Monroe Doctrine, (December 2, 1823), cornerstone of U.S. foreign policy enunciated by Pres. James Monroe in his annual message to Congress. Declaring that the Old World and New World had different systems and must remain distinct spheres, Monroe made four basic points: (1) the United States would not interfere in the internal affairs of or the wars between European powers; (2) the United States recognized and would not interfere with existing colonies and dependencies in the Western Hemisphere; (3) the Western Hemisphere was closed to future colonization; and (4) any attempt by a European power to oppress or control any nation in the Western Hemisphere would be viewed as a hostile act against the United States.
In declaring separate spheres of influence and a policy of non-intervention in the foreign affairs of Europe, the Monroe Doctrine drew on past statements of American diplomatic ideals, including George Washington’s Farewell Address in 1796, and James Madison’s declaration of war with Britain in 1812.
C probably if not then sorry
Answer:
a. revolutionary movement
Explanation:
Revolutionary movement -
It is the type of movement which lead to a huge revolution , is known as revolutionary movement .
A revolutionary movement require many small changes , which will atlast lead to a huge movement , and take over the control of the state .
In a slow pace , the small and major movements , become revolutionary .
Same is the case given in the question ,
Therefore , the correct term from the given options is a. revolutionary movement .
Answer:
The incentives favor running negative commercials regardless of what the other candidate does because if only one candidate runs negative ads, that candidate will have an electoral advantage
Explanation:
Strategic candidates air negative ads because the incentives favor running negative commercials regardless of what the other candidate does because if only one candidate runs negative ads, that candidate will have an electoral advantage over the other candidate which is why the two candidate will both would be happier if neither of them had run negative ads as opposed to both of them or one of them running the negative campaign ads.
